Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Muse Spark 1.1 leads Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 7.7, and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs 10.6x less per output token ($0.40 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
33
Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.40
0
vs boards won of 33 shared

Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 10.6x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
33
Muse Spark 1.1 only
63
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct only
20
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 38.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Korean: Muse Spark 1.1 1459 against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 1188, 45.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 per million output tokens, 10.6x apart.
Context window
Muse Spark 1.1 takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMuse Spark 1.1BarsQwen2.5 72B InstructTies
Coding20
Intelligence20
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General180
All shared boards330
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
LMArena WebDev1542Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding Index71.3Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)31.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)69.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)59.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured27.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
SciCode58.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured4.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WeirdMLNot measured16.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding14981292Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT14981292Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: React1532Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1540Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1540Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index33.77.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index154.1129.0Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index25.8Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1207Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1199Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1175Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1178Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1103Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1183Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1195Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1155Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets1042Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)57.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)56.4%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)1.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured34.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
APEX-Agents31.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
METR time horizonsNot measured35.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BALROGNot measured16.2%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompanyNot measured5.7%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2$6,520Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond91.2%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)89.8%49.1%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%3.6%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.1%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Chess puzzles34.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured79.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14851271Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert14781245Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14801279Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams1305Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1287Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured14.0Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.1%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
ProofBench39.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MATH level 5Not measured63.2%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14821283Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work14871290Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro88.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)85.0%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)71.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)79.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.1%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified57.8%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMLUNot measured85.3%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured94.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14841275Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14791258Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government14811288Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance14701253Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1270Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: UI components1289Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: game dev1269Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: data viz1268Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: 3D1260Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1276Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: SVG1235Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1271Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)61.3%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)45.6%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)88.9%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal Index66.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBenchNot measured36.9%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
DTBench94.4%62.9%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA49.9%13.4%Muse Spark 1.1
Surface Evolver Bench52.5%Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
HellaSwagNot measured84.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured82.3%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
PIQANot measured82.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text14781269Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following14571254Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing14351221Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision1293Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: English14781283Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English14711252Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese15151273Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German14691234Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese14501180Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean14591188Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French14921280Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish14641255Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian14821264Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish1499Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14841272Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries14621281Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language14481247Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14381211Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: English1292Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1348Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1301Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1288Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1253Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Document1465Not measuredOnly Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.019Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.076Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
SpecificationMeta Muse Spark 1.1Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
MakerMetaQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 16, 2026September 19, 2024
Context window1.05M33K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.36
Output $/Mtok$4.25$0.40
Coding index70.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.43Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Muse Spark 1.1 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 10.6x cheaper ($0.40 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Muse Spark 1.1's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next