Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 4 Scout vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads Llama 4 Scout on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 43.7 to 6.5, and Llama 4 Scout costs 5.4x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.70 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 4 ScoutMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$0.50
0
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
34
vs boards won of 34 shared

Llama 4 Scout or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.50 vs $2.70 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 1.05M tokens).

Shared results
34
Llama 4 Scout only
48
Step 5 Preview only
27
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 4 Scout not benchmarked, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 37.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Llama 4 Scout 27.7% against Step 5 Preview 88.3%, 60.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 4 Scout $0.50 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 5.4x apart.
Context window
Llama 4 Scout takes 1.31M tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 4 ScoutBarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning06
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards034
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutStep 5 PreviewLeader
SWE-bench Verified9.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1567Only Step 5 Preview measured
AA Coding Index8.2Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)38.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured39.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
SciCode21.3%58.9%Step 5 Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: coding12861485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT12861473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.543.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index129.6Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index0.5Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured50.7%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured27.3%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured40.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom15.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)28.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutStep 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond47.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)58.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%46.5%Step 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)51.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI0.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12661461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert12351485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12931454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams11251308Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: homework11481265Step 5 Preview
Kagi LLM Benchmark36.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutStep 5 PreviewLeader
AIME19.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)79.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MGSM (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AA Math Index14.0Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
OTIS Mock AIME7.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MATH level 562.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: math12871458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work12861460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutStep 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro69.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)72.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)46.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)55.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)57.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedQA (Vals AI)50.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedCode (Vals AI)23.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)75.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: science12781454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government12851437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance12571435Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutStep 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites750Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: UI components765Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: game dev772Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: data viz896Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Design Arena: all code categories789Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)34.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)50.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
IFBench39.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)27.7%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench57.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMCA12.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Fiction.LiveBench36.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text12791440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following12481438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing12491409Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision11181265Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: English13041447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English12521428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese12551500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1273Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: Japanese12061383Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Korean1207Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: French12831438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish12781441Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Russian12631433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1265Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12801437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries12651449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language12691425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12421412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: English11431290Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese1106Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: reading text11171282Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: humor1102Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1126Not measuredOnly Llama 4 Scout measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkLlama 4 ScoutStep 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.0004Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.010Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 4 Scout$0.040Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Llama 4 Scout costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 4 Scout and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationMeta Llama 4 ScoutStepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerMeta LlamaStepFun
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedApril 5, 2025October 8, 2026
Context window1.31M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.175$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.50$2.70
Coding indexNot benchmarked61.1
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved task$1.276Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 4 Scout better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Only Step 5 Preview has a coding score, 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 4 Scout has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 4 Scout for output tokens 5.4x cheaper ($0.50 vs $2.70 per million) and a larger context window (1.31M against 1.05M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Step 5 Preview?

Llama 4 Scout costs $0.175 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for Llama 4 Scout only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 4 Scout or Step 5 Preview?

Llama 4 Scout, with 1.31M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 4 Scout vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 4 Scout's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next