Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.5 to 7.7, and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs 6.1x less per output token ($0.72 vs $4.425 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 14 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
26.0
Output $/M
$0.72
0
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen
Coding
54.1
Overall
61.7
Output $/M
$4.425
14
vs boards won of 14 shared

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3.7 Max: which to pick

Only Qwen3.7 Max has a coding score, 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 6.1x cheaper ($0.72 vs $4.425 per million).

Shared results
14
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct only
38
Qwen3.7 Max only
45
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Max 54.1 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 90.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 5.1% against Qwen3.7 Max 95.6%, 90.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $0.72 against Qwen3.7 Max $4.425 per million output tokens, 6.1x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.7 Max 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.3 70B InstructBarsQwen3.7 MaxTies
Coding02
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning04
Math01
General04
All shared boards014
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 MaxLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1515Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
AA Coding Index11.966.0Qwen3.7 Max
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured87.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured68.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured13.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured61.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured49.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%50.8%Qwen3.7 Max
WeirdML14.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1189.4Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena Text: coding1268Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1273Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1514Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1512Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.729.5Qwen3.7 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3154.0Qwen3.7 Max
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured22.5Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1191Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1155Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1159Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1187Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1161Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1108Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1171Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured25.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
τ²-Bench Telecom26.6%94.7%Qwen3.7 Max
BALROG23.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)31.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 MaxLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured90.2%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.8%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%40.5%Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.4%90.9%Qwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench19.9%70.4%Qwen3.7 Max
Chess puzzlesNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
EBR-benchNot measured9.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1257Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1225Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1277Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Math Index7.7Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME5.1%95.6%Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured34.1%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
ProofBenchNot measured26.0%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
MATH level 541.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1267Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1267Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 MaxLeader
MMLU ProNot measured89.3%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.9%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured63.7%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured75.3%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured55.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
MMLU86.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1284Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1275Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1284Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1243Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1274Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1267Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1264Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1275Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1265Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1275Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1216Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1211Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 MaxLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured79.4%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
IFBench47.1%80.5%Qwen3.7 Max
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)15.7%79.0%Qwen3.7 Max
DTBench59.5%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max
LMCA17.5%44.0%Qwen3.7 Max
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1274Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1242Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1250Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1303Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1236Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1217Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1251Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1150Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1142Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French1282Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1269Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1252Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Polish1259Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1280Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1255Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1255Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1241Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.0037Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.087Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.097Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.7 Max$0.339Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Qwen3.7 Max
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.3 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max
MakerMeta LlamaQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 6, 2024May 21, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.45$1.475
Output $/Mtok$0.72$4.425
Coding indexNot benchmarked54.1
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$4.69
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Max for coding?

Only Qwen3.7 Max has a coding score, 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 6.1x cheaper ($0.72 vs $4.425 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3.7 Max?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $0.72 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.475 and $4.425. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.7 Max only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison based on?

14 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Max's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next