Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 leads Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 7.7, and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs 5.9x less per output token ($0.72 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
26.0
Output $/M
$0.72
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
70.3
Overall
67.0
Output $/M
$4.25
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 5.9x cheaper ($0.72 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
36
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct only
16
Muse Spark 1.1 only
68
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.1 70.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 45.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Llama 3.3 70B Instruct 15.7% against Muse Spark 1.1 77.7%, 62.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct $0.72 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 5.9x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.3 70B InstructBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General020
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.1Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding Index11.971.3Muse Spark 1.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)28.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
WeirdML14.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding12681498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT12731498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1539Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnANot measured42.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SWE Atlas: Test WritingNot measured41.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.733.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3154.1Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1173Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1108Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1122Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1013Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom26.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
BALROG23.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)31.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
MCP AtlasNot measured88.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured91.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)49.8%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.6%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)47.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
SimpleBench19.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12571485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert12251478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12771480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Math Index7.7Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)7.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME5.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MATH level 541.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math12671481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work12671485Muse Spark 1.1
MathArenaNot measured42.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured71.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured79.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)71.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MMLU86.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science12841483Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12751480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government12841482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance12431470Muse Spark 1.1
PRBench FinanceNot measured55.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
PRBench LegalNot measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1270Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1286Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1269Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1267Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1259Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1276Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1233Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1267Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench47.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)15.7%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench59.5%94.4%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA17.5%49.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.3 70B Instruct measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text12741478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following12421456Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12501435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: English13031478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English12361471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese12171515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German12511469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese11501450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean11421457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French12821494Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish12701462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian12521481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish12591497Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn12801484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries12551461Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language12551447Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12411437Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MultiChallengeNot measured75.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkLlama 3.3 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.025Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct$0.097Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.3 70B InstructMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerMeta LlamaMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 6, 2024July 16, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.45$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.72$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked70.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.1 has a coding score, 70.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.3 70B Instruct for output tokens 5.9x cheaper ($0.72 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $0.72 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.1 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next