Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 leads Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.2 to 6.9, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 15.0x less per output token ($0.08 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 40 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
40
vs boards won of 40 shared

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or MiniMax M3: which to pick

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 15.0x cheaper ($0.08 vs $1.20 per million).

Shared results
40
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
11
MiniMax M3 only
77
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked, MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 72.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 16.4% against MiniMax M3 88.9%, 72.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 15.0x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131K tokens, MiniMax M3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 8B InstructBarsMiniMax M3Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Agentic work01
Reasoning06
Math03
Knowledge04
General020
All shared boards040
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured70.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1482Only MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding Index5.458.6MiniMax M3
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured1.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured19.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured9.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured47.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%42.4%MiniMax M3
FrontierCodeNot measured14.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
WeirdML1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured640.0Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: coding11951470MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: software and IT11951466MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1478Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1455Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1470Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.929.2MiniMax M3
Epoch Capabilities Index116.5146.9MiniMax M3
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured29.5Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1200Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1169Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1159Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1120Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1178Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1042Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured12.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured29.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom16.4%88.9%MiniMax M3
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured4.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
BALROG15.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$2,158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)25.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured74.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.9%92.9%MiniMax M3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%39.0%MiniMax M3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)27.0%90.9%MiniMax M3
SimpleBenchNot measured45.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured13.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11751447MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: expert11441461MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11961455MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1266Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1268Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3Leader
AA Math Index4.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME1.7%71.1%MiniMax M3
ProofBenchNot measured18.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MATH level 522.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8K82.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math11791429MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: mathematical work11801448MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured84.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured46.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)47.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
MMLU56.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science11931452MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11821441MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: legal and government12061437MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: business and finance11661434MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1257Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1243Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1210Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1236Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1208Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1246Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1160Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1161Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured66.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench28.6%82.9%MiniMax M3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)18.0%83.0%MiniMax M3
DTBench50.9%78.9%MiniMax M3
LMCA5.4%33.7%MiniMax M3
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured55.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
PIQA81.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text11871433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: instruction following11591433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: creative writing11541404MiniMax M3
LMArena VisionNot measured1251Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: English12181443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: non-English11481420MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Chinese11511466MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: German11441428MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Japanese10611380MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Korean10531373MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: French11781444MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Spanish11691433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Russian11581426MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1423Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn11721443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: longer queries11811446MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: writing and language11621419MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11451403MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1263Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1311Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1259Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1234Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1435Only MiniMax M3 measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1150Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and MiniMax M3
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 8B InstructMiniMax M3
MakerMeta LlamaMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024May 31, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.05$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.08$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.2
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better than MiniMax M3 for coding?

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 15.0x cheaper ($0.08 vs $1.20 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or MiniMax M3?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?

40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next