Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 leads Llama 3.1 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 6.9, and Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs 53.1x less per output token ($0.08 vs $4.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
17.9
Output $/M
$0.08
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
34
vs boards won of 34 shared

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 53.1x cheaper ($0.08 vs $4.25 per million).

Shared results
34
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct only
17
Muse Spark 1.2 only
63
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 57.2 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Korean: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct 1053 against Muse Spark 1.2 1462, 68.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.08 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 53.1x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryLlama 3.1 8B InstructBarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General017
All shared boards034
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding Index5.472.2Muse Spark 1.2
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)11.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured57.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)0.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdML1.7%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: coding11951505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT11951505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index6.939.6Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities Index116.5155.1Muse Spark 1.2
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1221Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1181Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1223Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1085Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1173Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom16.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BALROG15.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)25.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)25.9%90.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.3%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)27.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts11751489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert11441475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English11961487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Math Index4.3Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.3%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME1.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MATH level 522.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
GSM8K82.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math11791484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work11801480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)47.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU56.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science11931500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare11821496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government12061517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance11661484Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1312Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1299Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1334Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1300Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1312Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1283Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1285Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index017
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBench28.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)18.0%79.0%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench50.9%94.7%Muse Spark 1.2
LMCA5.4%48.4%Muse Spark 1.2
PIQA81.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text11871482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following11591462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing11541436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena VisionNot measured1304Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: English12181483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English11481476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese11511509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1144Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1061Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 8B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean10531462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: French11781495Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Spanish11691484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian11581483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: multi-turn11721502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries11811473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language11621453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media11451443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 8B InstructMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0001Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.0027Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.011Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 8B InstructMeta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerMeta LlamaMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024August 5, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.05$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.08$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked55.7
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 8B Instruct for output tokens 53.1x cheaper ($0.08 vs $4.25 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.2?

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next