Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs Hy4 preview

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs 4.5x less per output token than Hy4 preview ($0.56 vs $2.501 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Llama 3.1 70B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
24.3
Output $/M
$0.56
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
vs $0.56 vs $2.501 per 1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 4.5x cheaper.

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Only Hy4 preview has a coding score, 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 4.5x cheaper ($0.56 vs $2.501 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and WeirdML; Hy4 preview on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct not benchmarked, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct $0.56 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 4.5x apart.
Context window
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct takes 131K tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 previewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1631Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only Hy4 preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)3.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
WeirdML9.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding1260Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1260Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1653Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1620Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.6Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Epoch Capabilities Index125.9Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 previewLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom15.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
BALROG27.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompany6.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)40.9%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.5%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)44.2%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1241Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expert1209Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1261Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 previewLeader
AA Math Index4.0Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)4.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME3.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
ProofBenchNot measured75.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
MATH level 536.7%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math1252Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1253Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 previewLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)67.6%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
MMLU80.1%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science1276Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1257Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1283Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1235Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards measured
General benchmarks for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 70B InstructHy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
IFBench34.4%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
DTBench60.0%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMCA14.8%Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text1261Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1231Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1232Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English1294Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-English1219Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1215Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: German1222Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1132Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Korean1140Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: French1262Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1253Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: Russian1234Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1256Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1241Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1236Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1230Not measuredOnly Llama 3.1 70B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.0008Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.030Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.118Exceeds the context window
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Hy4 preview
SpecificationMeta Llama 3.1 70B InstructTencent Hy4 preview
MakerMeta LlamaTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 23, 2024August 28, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.56$0.834
Output $/Mtok$0.56$2.501
Coding indexNot benchmarked44.3
Independent measurements behind it03
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Only Hy4 preview has a coding score, 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.1 70B Instruct for output tokens 4.5x cheaper ($0.56 vs $2.501 per million).

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Hy4 preview?

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.56 per million input tokens and $0.56 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and Hy4 preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and WeirdML; Hy4 preview on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) and Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next