LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.1

Updated October 21, 2026. 13 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Coding
63.4
Overall
22.0
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
48.9
Overall
33.7
Output $/M
$4.25
13
vs boards won of 13 shared

Decision reading

Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for coding: it scores 63.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Muse Spark 1.1.

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when a solved task costs $0.43 against $0.61, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.

Shared results
13
Kimi K2 Thinking only
17
Muse Spark 1.1 only
83
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2 Thinking 63.4 from 1 benchmark, Muse Spark 1.1 48.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 22.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI): Kimi K2 Thinking 63.1% against Muse Spark 1.1 85.9%, 22.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2 Thinking $2.50 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2 Thinking takes 262K tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2 ThinkingBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding02
Intelligence02
Reasoning03
Knowledge04
Web design01
General01
All shared boards013
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMuse Spark 1.1Leader
SWE-bench Verified63.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.3Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)63.1%85.9%Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)60.2%82.0%Muse Spark 1.1
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)85.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Terminal-Bench35.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
WeirdML42.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
ALE-Bench597.5Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1498Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1498Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.033.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index145.8154.1Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1177Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1184Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1194Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1156Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured974Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
METR time horizons59.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA Diamond78.5%91.2%Muse Spark 1.1
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)83.8%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.8%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
Chess puzzlesNot measured34.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1485Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1480Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1305Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1287Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AIME85.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AA Math Index94.7Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)94.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1482Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1487Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU Pro81.1%88.7%Muse Spark 1.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.2%85.0%Muse Spark 1.1
CaseLaw (Vals AI)65.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.6%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%79.7%Muse Spark 1.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)92.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured57.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1479Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1481Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1470Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites11131270Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1290Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1269Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1268Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1260Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1276Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1234Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1270Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench68.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBenchNot measured94.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMCANot measured49.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
CL-bench17.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2 Thinking measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1457Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1435Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1293Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1478Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1471Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1515Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1469Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1450Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1459Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1492Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1464Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1482Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1499Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1448Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1438Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1292Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1348Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1288Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1253Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkKimi K2 ThinkingMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.0019Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

Kimi K2 Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.037Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

Kimi K2 Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking$0.145Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

Kimi K2 Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2 Thinking and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2 ThinkingMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerMoonshot AIMeta
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 6, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.60$1.25
Output $/Mtok$2.50$4.25
Coding index63.448.9
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.61$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2 Thinking better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Pick Kimi K2 Thinking for coding: it scores 63.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 48.9 for Muse Spark 1.1. Pick Muse Spark 1.1 when a solved task costs $0.43 against $0.61, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 262K tokens.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking or Muse Spark 1.1?

Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Kimi K2 Thinking costs $0.61 and Muse Spark 1.1 $0.43.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2 Thinking or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2 Thinking vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K2 Thinking's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next