Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 leads Kimi K2.5 on coding, 39.5 to 38.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs 1.6x less per output token ($1.80 vs $2.85 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
Coding
38.6
Overall
44.8
Output $/M
$2.85
11
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen
Coding
39.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.80
7
vs boards won of 18 shared

Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: which to pick

Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 are level for coding, 38.6 against 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide.

Pick Kimi K2.5 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.24 against $1.35) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or ALE-Bench, where it leads. Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.80 vs $2.85 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
18
Kimi K2.5 only
81
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 only
7
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2.5 38.6 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 39.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 32.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
MMMU Pro (Vals AI): Kimi K2.5 84.3% against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 22.8%, 61.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2.5 $2.85 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.80 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2.5 takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2.5BarsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Ties
Coding22
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning11
Math10
Knowledge33
General21
All shared boards117
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SWE-bench Verified70.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1437Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
AA Coding Index46.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.9%85.3%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%71.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)17.5%15.7%Kimi K2.5
Code migration (Vals AI)7.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench43.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
WeirdML45.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
ALE-Bench821.6608.9Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: coding1483Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1471Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1429Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1426Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1439Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.5Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index148.1146.2Kimi K2.5
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1136Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1114Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1147Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1118Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1219Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)35.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)28.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
OSWorld63.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$1,198$1Kimi K2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
GPQA Diamond84.1%87.4%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)84.3%22.8%Kimi K2.5
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured84.8%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
ARC-AGI65.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
ARC-AGI-211.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleBench46.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1453Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1466Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1460Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1282Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1297Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark78.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
AIME95.6%86.0%Kimi K2.5
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMArena Text: math1470Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1473Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
MMLU Pro85.9%87.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)58.7%59.7%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.3%65.3%Kimi K2.5
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.5%60.8%Kimi K2.5
MedQA (Vals AI)94.4%95.2%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MedCode (Vals AI)39.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified34.3%25.4%Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: science1459Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1448Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1441Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1427Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Design Arena: websites1248Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1234Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1206Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1219Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1204Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1236Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1149Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1166Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
General benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9%30.4%Kimi K2.5
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
IFBench70.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
DTBenchNot measured80.5%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
LMCANot measured36.4%Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 measured
Fiction.LiveBench86.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
CL-bench19.3%19.8%Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
CL-bench Life13.2%12.4%Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1431Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1422Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision1269Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1453Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1433Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1494Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1441Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1423Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1412Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1454Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1450Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1435Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1444Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1425Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1417Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1328Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1276Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1284Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1257Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1285Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1269Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2.5$0.0020Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2.5$0.035Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2.5$0.135Fits in one request
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20$0.078Fits in one request

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2.5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
MakerMoonshot AIQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 27, 2026April 27, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.532$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.85$1.80
Coding index38.639.5
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved task$0.24$1.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2.5 better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for coding?

Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 are level for coding, 38.6 against 39.5 on the Vibe Coding Index, so price and context decide. Pick Kimi K2.5 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.24 against $1.35) and work measured by Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) or ALE-Bench, where it leads. Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($1.80 vs $2.85 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Kimi K2.5 costs $0.532 per million input tokens and $2.85 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.30 and $1.80. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Kimi K2.5 costs $0.24 and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 $1.35.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/kimi-k2-5-vs-qwen3-5-plus-20260420" title="Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/kimi-k2-5-vs-qwen3-5-plus-20260420">LLMBenchmark.ai, Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20</a></p>