Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads Kimi K2.5 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 23.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 5.7x less per output token ($0.50 vs $2.85 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
Coding
38.6
Overall
44.8
Output $/M
$2.85
6
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
1
vs boards won of 8 shared, 1 tied

Kimi K2.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Only Kimi K2.5 has a coding score, 38.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 5.7x cheaper ($0.50 vs $2.85 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
8
Kimi K2.5 only
99
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
8
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2.5 38.6 from 3 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 10.3 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Kimi K2.5 1206 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1110, 12.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Kimi K2.5 $2.85 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 5.7x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2.5 takes 262K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryKimi K2.5BarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning001 tie
Web design50
General10
All shared boards611 tie
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index23 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
SWE-bench Verified70.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LMArena WebDev1437Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
AA Coding Index46.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)7.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench43.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
WeirdML45.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
ALE-Bench821.6Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1483Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1471Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1429Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1426Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1439Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Codebase QnA13.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Refactoring20.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE Atlas: Test Writing25.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.526.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Epoch Capabilities Index148.1Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1136Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1114Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1147Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1118Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1219Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)35.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)28.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
OSWorld63.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$1,198Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MCP Atlas64.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
GPQA Diamond84.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)84.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.7%30.7%Tie
ARC-AGI65.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
ARC-AGI-211.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleBench46.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1453Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1466Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1460Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1282Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1297Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark78.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1470Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1473Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MathArena17.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MMLU Pro85.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)58.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)39.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified34.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1459Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1448Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1441Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1427Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
PRBench Finance46.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
PRBench Legal43.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websites12481173Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: UI components12341149Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: game dev12061110Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: data viz1219Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D12041128Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: all code categories12361154Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: SVG1148Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1165Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
IFBench70.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%69.0%Kimi K2.5
Fiction.LiveBench86.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
CL-bench19.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
CL-bench Life13.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1431Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1422Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision1269Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1453Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1433Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1494Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1441Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1423Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1412Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1454Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1450Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1435Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1444Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1425Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1417Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1328Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1276Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1284Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1257Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1285Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1269Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MultiChallenge61.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2.5$0.0020Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2.5$0.035Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2.5$0.135Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2.5NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerMoonshot AINVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 27, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.532$0.15
Output $/Mtok$2.85$0.50
Coding index38.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it31
Cost per solved task$0.24Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2.5 better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Only Kimi K2.5 has a coding score, 38.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 5.7x cheaper ($0.50 vs $2.85 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Kimi K2.5 costs $0.532 per million input tokens and $2.85 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Kimi K2.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next