Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Kimi K2.5 vs Moondream 3 Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
Coding
38.6
Overall
23.5
Output $/M
$2.85
M Moondream 3 PreviewMoondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $2.85 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Moondream 3 Preview is 1.1x cheaper.

Decision reading

Only Kimi K2.5 has a coding score, 38.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3 Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Moondream 3 Preview has the edge where output tokens cost 1.1x less.

Shared results
0
Kimi K2.5 only
98
Moondream 3 Preview only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Kimi K2.5 38.6 from 3 benchmarks, Moondream 3 Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Kimi K2.5 $2.85 against Moondream 3 Preview $2.50 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Kimi K2.5 takes 262K tokens, Moondream 3 Preview 32K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index18 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
SWE-bench Verified70.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE-bench Multilingual67.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1437Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
AA Coding Index46.8Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)70.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)17.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)7.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench43.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
WeirdML45.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
ALE-Bench821.6Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1483Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1471Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1429Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1426Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1439Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.5Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index148.1Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1136Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1114Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1147Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1125Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1219Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)35.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)28.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom95.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
OSWorld63.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$1,198Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond84.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)84.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
ARC-AGI65.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
ARC-AGI-211.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleBench46.8%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1453Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1466Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1460Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1282Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1297Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1470Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1473Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro85.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)58.7%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)66.5%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)39.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified34.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1459Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1448Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1441Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1427Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1249Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1236Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1207Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1218Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1205Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1236Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1149Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1165Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)49.9%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)76.4%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
IFBench70.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)78.0%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Fiction.LiveBench86.1%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
CL-bench19.3%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
CL-bench Life13.2%Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1431Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1422Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision1269Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1453Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1433Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1494Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1441Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1423Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1412Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1454Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1450Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1435Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1444Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1445Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1425Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1417Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1328Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1276Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1284Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1257Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1285Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1269Not measuredOnly Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
BenchmarkKimi K2.5Moondream 3 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Kimi K2.5$0.0020Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.0015Fits in one request

Moondream 3 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Kimi K2.5$0.035Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.022Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Kimi K2.5$0.135Fits in one request
Moondream 3 Preview$0.085Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Kimi K2.5 and Moondream 3 Preview
SpecificationMoonshotAI Kimi K2.5Moondream 3 Preview
MakerMoonshot AIMoondream
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 27, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window262K32K
Input $/Mtok$0.532$0.30
Output $/Mtok$2.85$2.50
Coding index38.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.24Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Kimi K2.5 better than Moondream 3 Preview for coding?

Only Kimi K2.5 has a coding score, 38.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Moondream 3 Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Moondream 3 Preview has the edge where output tokens cost 1.1x less.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Moondream 3 Preview?

Kimi K2.5 costs $0.532 per million input tokens and $2.85 per million output tokens; Moondream 3 Preview costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Kimi K2.5 or Moondream 3 Preview?

Kimi K2.5, with 262K tokens against 32K.

How many benchmarks is the Kimi K2.5 vs Moondream 3 Preview comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Kimi K2.5's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Moondream 3 Preview's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next