Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.5 vs Laguna S 2.1

Laguna S 2.1 costs 33.3x less per output token than Grok 4.5 ($0.18 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Grok 4.5xAI
Coding
58.6
Overall
62.1
Output $/M
$6.00
P Laguna S 2.1Poolside
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.18
vs $6.00 vs $0.18 per 1M output tokens. Laguna S 2.1 is 33.3x cheaper.

Grok 4.5 or Laguna S 2.1: which to pick

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Laguna S 2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Laguna S 2.1 for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($0.18 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Grok 4.5 has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index; Laguna S 2.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.5 58.6 from 6 benchmarks, Laguna S 2.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Grok 4.5 $6.00 against Laguna S 2.1 $0.18 per million output tokens, 33.3x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.5 takes 500K tokens, Laguna S 2.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index23 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Laguna S 2.1Leader
LiveBench coding94.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1553Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index72.4Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)69.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)36.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)66.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)71.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SciCode55.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
WeirdML46.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ALE-Bench1309.3Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding1474Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1471Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1556Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1567Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1562Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SciCode6.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Laguna S 2.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index38.8Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Epoch Capabilities Index154.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Laguna S 2.1Leader
AA Agentic Index41.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1218Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1221Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1242Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1204Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1233Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench research85.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser44.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic27.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)6.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
PostTrainBench23.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,887Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Search1216Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Laguna S 2.1Leader
GPQA Diamond92.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-252.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleBench70.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1462Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1465Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1304Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Laguna S 2.1Leader
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 357.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 424.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProofBench31.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1460Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1482Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Laguna S 2.1Leader
MMLU Pro89.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1440Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1463Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1441Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite50.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Laguna S 2.1Leader
Design Arena: websites1281Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1279Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1266Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1275Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1215Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench design78.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33 boards measured
General benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Laguna S 2.1Leader
LiveBench data analysis73.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index63.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
DTBench96.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMCA45.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Furniture assembly22.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1442Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision1287Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1453Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1440Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1495Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1430Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1406Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1457Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1451Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1449Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1456Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1462Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1434Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1345Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.0050Fits in one request
Laguna S 2.1$0.0002Fits in one request

Laguna S 2.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.118Fits in one request
Laguna S 2.1$0.0050Fits in one request

Laguna S 2.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.460Fits in one request
Laguna S 2.1$0.020Fits in one request

Laguna S 2.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.5Poolside Laguna S 2.1
MakerxAIPoolside
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 8, 2026July 21, 2026
Context window500K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.09
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.18
Coding index58.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Laguna S 2.1 for coding?

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Laguna S 2.1 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Laguna S 2.1 for output tokens 33.3x cheaper ($0.18 vs $6.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 500K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Laguna S 2.1?

Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Laguna S 2.1 costs $0.09 and $0.18. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.5 or Laguna S 2.1?

Laguna S 2.1, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

Has any benchmark tested both Grok 4.5 and Laguna S 2.1?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Grok 4.5 has results on LiveBench coding, LMArena WebDev and AA Coding Index; Laguna S 2.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next