Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Grok 4.5 leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.8 to 8.9, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 27.3x less per output token ($0.22 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.5xAI
Coding
58.6
Overall
62.1
Output $/M
$6.00
35
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
0
vs boards won of 35 shared

Grok 4.5 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which to pick

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 27.3x cheaper ($0.22 vs $6.00 per million).

Shared results
35
Grok 4.5 only
89
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
7
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.5 58.6 from 6 benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 40.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Grok 4.5 72.4 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 14.4, 58.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.5 $6.00 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 per million output tokens, 27.3x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.5 takes 500K tokens, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.5BarsNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTies
Coding40
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General180
All shared boards350
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
LiveBench coding94.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1553Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index72.414.4Grok 4.5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)69.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)36.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
IOI (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)66.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)71.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.1%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
SciCode55.0%30.6%Grok 4.5
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
WeirdML46.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ALE-Bench1309.3Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14741378Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14711383Grok 4.5
LMArena WebDev: React1556Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1567Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1562Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SciCode6.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index38.88.9Grok 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index154.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index41.21.0Grok 4.5
Design Arena: agents building web apps1218Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1220Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1155Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1209Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench research85.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser44.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic27.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)6.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured40.9%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
APEX-Agents56.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
PostTrainBench23.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,887Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Search1216Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond92.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.1%75.7%Grok 4.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%11.4%Grok 4.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-252.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleBench70.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14621348Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: expert14651355Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14641376Grok 4.5
LMArena Vision: diagrams1304Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured91.0Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.0%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 357.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 424.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProofBench31.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14601371Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14821375Grok 4.5
MathArena34.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro89.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.4%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
SimpleQA Verified48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14641353Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14401349Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14631341Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14411346Grok 4.5
FACTS Benchmark Suite50.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Design Arena: websites1281Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1277Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1263Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1266Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1275Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1214Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench design78.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index180
General benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
LiveBench data analysis73.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vals Multimodal Index63.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
IFBenchNot measured71.1%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%38.0%Grok 4.5
DTBench96.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMCA45.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Furniture assembly22.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text14481348Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14451303Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14421269Grok 4.5
LMArena Vision1287Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English14531377Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: non-English14401320Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14951383Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: German14481348Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: Japanese14301268Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: Korean14061269Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: French14571396Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14511376Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: Russian14491304Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: Polish14321303Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14561319Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14621300Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14451283Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14341293Grok 4.5
LMArena Vision: English1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1345Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.0050Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.118Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.460Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.5NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MakerxAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 8, 2026December 14, 2025
Context window500K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.055
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.22
Coding index58.6Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it60
Cost per solved task$0.62Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for coding?

Only Grok 4.5 has a coding score, 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 27.3x cheaper ($0.22 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 and $0.22. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.5 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Grok 4.5, with 500K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next