Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Grok 4.5 leads Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on coding, 58.6 to 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 40.8x less per output token ($0.147 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.5xAI
Coding
58.6
Overall
62.1
Output $/M
$6.00
19
Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA
Coding
22.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.147
0
vs boards won of 20 shared, 1 tied

Grok 4.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which to pick

Pick Grok 4.5 for coding: it scores 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Lightning for output tokens 40.8x cheaper ($0.147 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.06 against $0.62).

Shared results
20
Grok 4.5 only
103
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.5 58.6 from 6 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 22.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
General, 50.8 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
MedScribe (Vals AI): Grok 4.5 86.9% against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 4.3%, 82.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.5 $6.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning $0.147 per million output tokens, 40.8x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.5 takes 500K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.5BarsNemotron 3.5 LightningTies
Coding801 tie
Intelligence10
Agentic work50
Reasoning20
Knowledge10
General20
All shared boards1901 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index80
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
LiveBench coding94.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev1553Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
AA Coding Index72.426.8Grok 4.5
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)86.6%52.8%Grok 4.5
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)8.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)69.0%0.0%Grok 4.5
Code migration (Vals AI)36.6%3.0%Grok 4.5
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.0%Tie
IOI (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)67.8%10.9%Grok 4.5
SkillsBench (Vals AI)66.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)71.0%29.5%Grok 4.5
SciCode55.0%32.1%Grok 4.5
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
WeirdML46.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ALE-Bench1309.3769.2Grok 4.5
LMArena Text: coding1474Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1471Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: React1556Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1567Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1562Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SciCode6.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Intelligence Index38.812.9Grok 4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index154.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Agentic Index41.23.5Grok 4.5
Design Arena: agents building web apps1218Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1249Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1220Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1236Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1205Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1230Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench research85.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench browser44.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench long agentic27.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)0.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)48.4%18.5%Grok 4.5
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)24.9%2.6%Grok 4.5
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)38.0%2.9%Grok 4.5
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)52.9%17.0%Grok 4.5
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)6.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
APEX-Agents56.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
PostTrainBench23.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2$3,887Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Search1216Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
GPQA Diamond92.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench reasoning87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.1%74.3%Grok 4.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.7%10.6%Grok 4.5
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)93.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI87.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ARC-AGI-252.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleBench70.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Chess puzzles35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1462Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: expert1465Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1304Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1295Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
OTIS Mock AIME97.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 357.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FrontierMath, tier 424.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
ProofBench31.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: math1460Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1482Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
MMLU Pro89.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)86.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)67.4%54.2%Grok 4.5
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SimpleQA Verified48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: science1464Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1440Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1463Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1441Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite50.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
Design Arena: websites1281Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: UI components1280Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: game dev1264Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: data viz1266Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: 3D1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1275Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: SVG1215Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1256Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LiveBench design78.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
LiveBench data analysis73.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)35.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)86.9%4.3%Grok 4.5
Vals Multimodal Index63.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)79.3%60.3%Grok 4.5
DTBench96.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMCA45.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Furniture assembly22.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1442Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision1287Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: English1453Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1440Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1495Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: German1448Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1430Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1406Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: French1457Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1451Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1449Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1456Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1462Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1445Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1434Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: English1285Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1345Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1276Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1293Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
LMArena Document1452Not measuredOnly Grok 4.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGrok 4.5Nemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.0050Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0001Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.118Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0031Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.5$0.460Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.012Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.5 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.5NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
MakerxAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 8, 2026August 11, 2026
Context window500K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.0534
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.147
Coding index58.622.6
Independent measurements behind it62
Cost per solved task$0.62$0.06
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning for coding?

Pick Grok 4.5 for coding: it scores 58.6 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Lightning for output tokens 40.8x cheaper ($0.147 vs $6.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.06 against $0.62).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Grok 4.5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.0534 and $0.147. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Grok 4.5 costs $0.62 and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning $0.06.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.5 or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Grok 4.5, with 500K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.5's coding index rests on 6 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-5-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-5-lightning" title="Grok 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-5-vs-nvidia-nemotron-3-5-lightning">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning</a></p>