Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash leads Grok 4.3 on coding, 41.1 to 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.5-Flash costs 9.6x less per output token ($0.26 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 52 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.50
33
Qwen3.5-FlashQwen
Coding
41.1
Overall
50.1
Output $/M
$0.26
19
vs boards won of 52 shared

Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.5-Flash: which to pick

Pick Qwen3.5-Flash for coding: it scores 41.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Grok 4.3, though on 2 benchmarks against 3.

Pick Grok 4.3 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.31 against $0.40) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
52
Grok 4.3 only
53
Qwen3.5-Flash only
3
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen3.5-Flash 41.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 10.1 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3: Grok 4.3 42.8% against Qwen3.5-Flash 18.2%, 24.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.3 $2.50 against Qwen3.5-Flash $0.26 per million output tokens, 9.6x apart.
Context window
Both take 1M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.3BarsQwen3.5-FlashTies
Coding71
Reasoning43
Math22
Knowledge66
General147
All shared boards3319
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index71
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
LMArena WebDev13581244Grok 4.3
AA Coding Index42.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.5%83.3%Grok 4.3
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%64.4%Grok 4.3
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SciCode48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
WeirdML49.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-Bench944.2265.9Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: coding14151412Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: software and IT14161416Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena WebDev: React13531229Grok 4.3
LMArena WebDev: HTML13671291Grok 4.3
LMArena WebDev: from an image1375Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.9Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured143.5Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index15.5Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1126Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1006Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1058Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps962Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games914Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1007Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides959Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides988Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets879Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)18.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$35Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Search1166Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index43
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond91.4%82.8%Grok 4.3
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.1%81.9%Grok 4.3
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.8%82.3%Grok 4.3
Chess puzzles18.0%14.0%Grok 4.3
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured20.0%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13961403Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: expert13841407Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14021409Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Vision: diagrams1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
AIMENot measured92.5%Only Qwen3.5-Flash measured
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%84.4%Grok 4.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 342.8%18.2%Grok 4.3
FrontierMath, tier 414.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBench11.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: math13871407Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: mathematical work13961413Qwen3.5-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index66
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%84.1%Grok 4.3
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.5%84.3%Grok 4.3
CaseLaw (Vals AI)79.3%56.0%Grok 4.3
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.5%63.6%Grok 4.3
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%72.2%Qwen3.5-Flash
MortgageTax (Vals AI)48.3%67.4%Qwen3.5-Flash
MedCode (Vals AI)38.1%33.0%Grok 4.3
SimpleQA Verified33.2%20.3%Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: science13991415Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13841407Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: legal and government13861398Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: business and finance13811394Qwen3.5-Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1196Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1190Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1173Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1179Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1124Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1186Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1080Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1125Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index147
General benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)19.7%42.5%Qwen3.5-Flash
MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4%70.6%Grok 4.3
Vals Multimodal Index43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench83.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
DTBench90.7%82.9%Grok 4.3
LMCA38.3%29.1%Grok 4.3
LMArena Text13971397Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: instruction following13661374Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: creative writing13801343Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14041404Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: non-English13851385Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Chinese14221445Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: German13951390Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Japanese13791369Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Korean13541344Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: French14111413Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: Spanish13991400Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text: Russian13991380Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Polish13981376Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14061393Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: longer queries13931392Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: writing and language13851369Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13701347Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: English1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1222Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1237Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.5-FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0002Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-Flash$0.0040Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-Flash$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.5-Flash
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.3Qwen3.5-Flash
MakerxAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 30, 2026February 25, 2026
Context window1M1M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.065
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.26
Coding index37.441.1
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved task$0.31$0.40
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Qwen3.5-Flash for coding?

Pick Qwen3.5-Flash for coding: it scores 41.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Grok 4.3, though on 2 benchmarks against 3. Pick Grok 4.3 for a lower cost per solved task ($0.31 against $0.40) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-Flash costs $0.065 and $0.26. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Grok 4.3 costs $0.31 and Qwen3.5-Flash $0.40.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.5-Flash?

Neither: both take 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.5-Flash comparison based on?

52 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Grok 4.3's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-Flash's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-3-vs-qwen3-5-flash-02-23" title="Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.5-Flash, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-3-vs-qwen3-5-flash-02-23">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.5-Flash</a></p>