Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.3 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Grok 4.3 leads Qwen2.5 72B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.9 to 7.7, and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs 6.3x less per output token ($0.40 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
53.1
Output $/M
$2.50
38
Qwen2.5 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
26.5
Output $/M
$0.40
0
vs boards won of 38 shared

Grok 4.3 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: which to pick

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.50 per million).

Shared results
38
Grok 4.3 only
66
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct only
15
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 63.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: Grok 4.3 93.3% against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 8.1%, 85.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.3 $2.50 against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct $0.40 per million output tokens, 6.3x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.3 takes 1M tokens, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.3BarsQwen2.5 72B InstructTies
Coding40
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning60
Math30
Knowledge40
General190
All shared boards380
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index40
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
LMArena WebDev1358Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
AA Coding Index42.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)6.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured27.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
SciCode48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%4.5%Grok 4.3
WeirdML49.9%16.0%Grok 4.3
ALE-Bench944.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: coding14151292Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: software and IT14161292Grok 4.3
LMArena WebDev: React1353Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1367Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1375Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.97.7Grok 4.3
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured129.0Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index15.5Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1126Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1006Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1059Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps961Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games914Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games1007Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1008Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1013Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)18.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%34.5%Grok 4.3
METR time horizonsNot measured35.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
BALROGNot measured16.2%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
TheAgentCompanyNot measured5.7%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2$35Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Search1166Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond91.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.1%49.1%Grok 4.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.2%3.6%Grok 4.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.8%49.1%Grok 4.3
Chess puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
BIG-Bench HardNot measured79.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13961271Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: expert13841245Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14021279Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: diagrams1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured14.0Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured14.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%8.1%Grok 4.3
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 342.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 414.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBench11.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MATH level 5Not measured63.2%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math13871283Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: mathematical work13961290Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured72.0%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified33.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMLUNot measured85.3%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
AI2 Reasoning ChallengeNot measured94.5%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science13991275Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13841258Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: legal and government13861288Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: business and finance13811253Grok 4.3
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1196Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: UI components1192Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: game dev1174Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: data viz1179Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: 3D1125Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1187Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: SVG1081Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1125Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index190
General benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench83.3%36.9%Grok 4.3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
DTBench90.7%62.9%Grok 4.3
LMCA38.3%13.4%Grok 4.3
HellaSwagNot measured84.8%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
WinoGrandeNot measured82.3%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
PIQANot measured82.6%Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Text13971269Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: instruction following13661254Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: creative writing13801221Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English14041283Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: non-English13851252Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Chinese14221273Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: German13951234Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Japanese13791180Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Korean13541188Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: French14111280Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Spanish13991255Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Russian13991264Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: Polish1398Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14061272Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: longer queries13931281Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: writing and language13851247Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13701211Grok 4.3
LMArena Vision: English1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1222Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1237Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.019Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.076Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.3 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.3Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
MakerxAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026September 19, 2024
Context window1M33K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.36
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.40
Coding index37.4Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it30
Cost per solved task$0.31Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for coding?

Only Grok 4.3 has a coding score, 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen2.5 72B Instruct for output tokens 6.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $2.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.36 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Grok 4.3, with 1M tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.3 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.3's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next