Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads Grok 4.3 on coding, 82.2 to 37.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Grok 4.3 costs 4.0x less per output token ($2.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 18 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
37.4
Overall
56.8
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AI
Coding
82.2
Overall
74.4
Output $/M
$10.00
18
vs boards won of 18 shared

Grok 4.3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro: which to pick

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Grok 4.3.

Pick Grok 4.3 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
18
Grok 4.3 only
86
Kimi K3.1 Pro only
17
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.3 37.4 from 3 benchmarks, Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.2 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 80.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
ProofBench: Grok 4.3 11.0% against Kimi K3.1 Pro 91.0%, 80.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.3 $2.50 against Kimi K3.1 Pro $10.00 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.3 takes 1M tokens, Kimi K3.1 Pro 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.3BarsKimi K3.1 ProTies
Coding06
Agentic work02
Reasoning01
Math01
Web design07
General01
All shared boards018
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured81.8%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LMArena WebDev13581695Kimi K3.1 Pro
AA Coding Index42.2Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured63.6%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)19.4%84.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Code migration (Vals AI)6.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured81.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SciCode48.3%60.8%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
WeirdML49.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ALE-Bench944.21932.8Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: coding1414Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1416Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React13531701Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: HTML13671706Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena WebDev: from an image1375Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured46.0Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
AA Agentic Index15.5Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1127Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1006Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1058Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps961Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games914Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: agents building games971Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides905Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides970Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheets928Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured77.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench browserNot measured75.9%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured39.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.2%24.9%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%37.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured11.7%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)18.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured75.6%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured31.4%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured44.4%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$35Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Search1166Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
GPQA Diamond91.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured91.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured26.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.2%52.5%Kimi K3.1 Pro
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Chess puzzles18.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1396Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1385Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1402Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 342.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
FrontierMath, tier 414.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
ProofBench11.0%91.0%Kimi K3.1 Pro
LMArena Text: math1387Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1397Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MathArenaNot measured59.6%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SimpleQA Verified33.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: science1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1384Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1386Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1381Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
Design Arena: websites11941325Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: UI components11881400Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: game dev11711410Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: data viz11811300Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: 3D11211451Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: all code categories11851354Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: SVG10791328Kimi K3.1 Pro
Design Arena: ASCII art1123Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured77.8%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
Vals IndexNot measured62.5%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.1%Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench83.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.0%86.3%Kimi K3.1 Pro
DTBench90.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMCA38.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text1397Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1366Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1380Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English1404Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1385Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1421Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: German1397Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1379Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1355Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: French1411Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1398Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1398Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1406Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1393Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1385Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1370Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1222Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1237Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
EQ-Bench 41065Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K3.1 ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.0070Fits in one request

Grok 4.3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.130Fits in one request

Grok 4.3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request
Kimi K3.1 Pro$0.500Fits in one request

Grok 4.3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.3 and Kimi K3.1 Pro
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.3MoonshotAI Kimi K3.1 Pro
MakerxAIMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 30, 2026October 23, 2026
Context window1M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$2.00
Output $/Mtok$2.50$10.00
Coding index37.482.2
Independent measurements behind it34
Cost per solved task$0.31Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding?

Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 37.4 for Grok 4.3. Pick Grok 4.3 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($2.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K3.1 Pro?

Kimi K3.1 Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro comparison based on?

18 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. Grok 4.3's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Kimi K3.1 Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-3-vs-kimi-k3-1-pro" title="Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-3-vs-kimi-k3-1-pro">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro</a></p>