LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Updated October 21, 2026. 46 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Grok 4.3xAI
Coding
22.5
Overall
24.9
Output $/M
$2.50
10
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Coding
39.1
Overall
25.8
Output $/M
$3.35
35
vs boards won of 46 shared, 1 tied

Decision reading

Pick Kimi K2.7 Code for coding: it scores 39.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.5 for Grok 4.3.

Pick Grok 4.3 when output tokens cost 1.3x less, or when a solved task costs $0.31 against $0.35.

Shared results
46
Grok 4.3 only
58
Kimi K2.7 Code only
5
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.3 22.5 from 1 benchmark, Kimi K2.7 Code 39.1 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 17.4 points apart on average over 11 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vending-Bench 2: Grok 4.3 $35 against Kimi K2.7 Code $5,083, 31.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.3 $2.50 against Kimi K2.7 Code $3.35 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.3 takes 1M tokens, Kimi K2.7 Code 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.3BarsKimi K2.7 CodeTies
Coding3121 tie
Intelligence01
Agentic work110
Reasoning40
Math12
Knowledge01
Web design08
General11
All shared boards10351 tie
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index312
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
LMArena WebDev13581474Kimi K2.7 Code
AA Coding Index42.260.8Kimi K2.7 Code
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.5%82.0%Grok 4.3
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)71.4%78.2%Kimi K2.7 Code
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)19.4%47.2%Kimi K2.7 Code
Code migration (Vals AI)6.8%25.4%Kimi K2.7 Code
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%0.0%Tie
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)42.0%67.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
SkillsBench (Vals AI)40.6%50.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
SciCode48.3%47.8%Grok 4.3
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%44.7%Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierCodeNot measured30.1%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
WeirdML49.9%54.1%Kimi K2.7 Code
ALE-Bench944.2886.2Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: coding1415Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1416Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena WebDev: React13531475Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev: HTML13671451Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena WebDev: from an image13751513Kimi K2.7 Code
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.925.8Kimi K2.7 Code
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured150.1Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
AA Agentic Index15.521.0Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building web apps11261176Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps10061175Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps10591143Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building Android apps9671143Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building Godot games9141147Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: agents building games10071130Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: HTML slides10081201Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides10121154Kimi K2.7 Code
Finance Agent (Vals AI)37.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)6.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)15.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)18.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom97.7%90.1%Grok 4.3
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.6%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Vending-Bench 2$35$5,083Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Search1166Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
GPQA Diamond91.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)90.1%89.6%Grok 4.3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)37.2%35.0%Grok 4.3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)88.8%87.9%Grok 4.3
SimpleBenchNot measured57.9%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
Chess puzzles18.0%14.0%Grok 4.3
LMArena Text: hard prompts1396Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: expert1384Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1402Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: homework1241Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
OTIS Mock AIME93.3%95.6%Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 342.8%54.0%Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath, tier 414.6%12.2%Grok 4.3
ProofBench11.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: math1387Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1396Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
MMLU Pro85.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)84.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)70.8%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)48.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SimpleQA Verified33.2%36.5%Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text: science1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1384Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1386Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1381Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Design Arena: websites11961264Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: UI components11921259Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: game dev11741220Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: data viz11801226Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: 3D11251241Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: all code categories11871253Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: SVG10811176Kimi K2.7 Code
Design Arena: ASCII art11251196Kimi K2.7 Code
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)19.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)74.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Vals Multimodal Index43.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
IFBench83.3%63.1%Grok 4.3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)75.0%79.3%Kimi K2.7 Code
DTBench90.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMCA38.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured48.8%Only Kimi K2.7 Code measured
LMArena Text1397Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1366Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1380Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: English1404Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1385Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1422Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: German1395Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1379Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1354Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: French1411Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1399Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1398Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1406Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1393Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1385Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1370Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: English1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1257Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1235Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: humor1222Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1237Not measuredOnly Grok 4.3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Kimi K2.7 CodeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.0025Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.0023Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.070Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.044Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.3$0.275Fits in one request
Kimi K2.7 Code$0.168Fits in one request

Kimi K2.7 Code costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.3 and Kimi K2.7 Code
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.3MoonshotAI Kimi K2.7 Code
MakerxAIMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 30, 2026June 12, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.6712
Output $/Mtok$2.50$3.35
Coding index22.539.1
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.31$0.35
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Kimi K2.7 Code for coding?

Pick Kimi K2.7 Code for coding: it scores 39.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.5 for Grok 4.3. Pick Grok 4.3 when output tokens cost 1.3x less, or when a solved task costs $0.31 against $0.35.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Grok 4.3 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code costs $0.6712 and $3.35. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, Grok 4.3 costs $0.31 and Kimi K2.7 Code $0.35.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.3 or Kimi K2.7 Code?

Grok 4.3, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.3 vs Kimi K2.7 Code comparison based on?

46 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.3's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Kimi K2.7 Code's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next