Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.20 vs Step 5 Preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 9 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Grok 4.20xAI
Coding
33.3
Overall
25.7
Output $/M
$2.50
0
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
43.7
Output $/M
$2.70
9
vs boards won of 9 shared

Decision reading

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.3 for Grok 4.20.

Pick Grok 4.20 when output tokens cost 1.1x less, or when the context window is larger, 2M against 1.05M tokens.

Shared results
9
Grok 4.20 only
45
Step 5 Preview only
52
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.20 33.3 from 2 benchmarks, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 52.5 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): Grok 4.20 4.1% against Step 5 Preview 70.4%, 66.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.20 $2.50 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.20 takes 2M tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.20BarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work04
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards09
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1567Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)4.1%70.4%Step 5 Preview
Code migration (Vals AI)0.3%39.0%Step 5 Preview
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCodeNot measured58.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Terminal-Bench57.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
WeirdML52.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1485Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1473Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Step 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index25.743.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index152.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1144Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1054Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1090Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1052Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1089Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1180Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)28.5%50.7%Step 5 Preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.0%27.3%Step 5 Preview
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%40.4%Step 5 Preview
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)11.7%57.1%Step 5 Preview
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Vending-Bench 2$4,663Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Step 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond88.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%46.5%Step 5 Preview
ARC-AGI89.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
ARC-AGI-265.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1461Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1485Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1454Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1308Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Step 5 PreviewLeader
AIME96.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
ProofBenchNot measured42.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1458Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1460Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Step 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro86.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)54.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1454Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1439Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1437Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1435Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Step 5 PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: UI components1199Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: game dev1192Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: data viz1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: 3D1193Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1221Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: SVG1164Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1174Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Step 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)38.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Vals Multimodal Index39.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
IFBench81.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench90.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LMCA38.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
CL-bench22.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
CL-bench Life11.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1440Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1438Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1409Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1265Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1447Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1428Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1500Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1383Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1438Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1441Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1433Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1437Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1449Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1425Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1412Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1290Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1282Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Step 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.20$0.0025Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.20$0.070Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.20$0.275Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

Step 5 Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.20 and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.20StepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerxAIStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 31, 2026October 8, 2026
Context window2M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$1.00
Output $/Mtok$2.50$2.70
Coding index33.361.1
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved task$0.72Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.20 better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.3 for Grok 4.20. Pick Grok 4.20 when output tokens cost 1.1x less, or when the context window is larger, 2M against 1.05M tokens.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 or Step 5 Preview?

Grok 4.20 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.20 or Step 5 Preview?

Grok 4.20, with 2M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.20 vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.20's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/grok-4-20-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview" title="Grok 4.20 vs Step 5 Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/grok-4-20-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, Grok 4.20 vs Step 5 Preview</a></p>