Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.20 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Grok 4.20 leads Llama 3.2 3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.7 to 5.7, and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs 7.5x less per output token ($0.3325 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

Grok 4.20xAI
Coding
33.3
Overall
25.7
Output $/M
$2.50
6
Llama 3.2 3B InstructMeta Llama
Coding
No data
Overall
5.7
Output $/M
$0.3325
0
vs boards won of 6 shared

Grok 4.20 or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: which to pick

Only Grok 4.20 has a coding score, 33.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $2.50 per million).

Shared results
6
Grok 4.20 only
48
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct only
28
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.20 33.3 from 2 benchmarks, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 71.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Grok 4.20 93.0% against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 21.1%, 71.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Grok 4.20 $2.50 against Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.3325 per million output tokens, 7.5x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.20 takes 2M tokens, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGrok 4.20BarsLlama 3.2 3B InstructTies
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
General20
All shared boards60
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)72.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)4.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)0.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)44.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured8.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)37.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Terminal-Bench57.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
WeirdML52.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1098Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1103Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index25.75.7Grok 4.20
Epoch Capabilities Index152.1Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1144Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1054Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1090Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1052Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games1089Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1180Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)28.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)7.0%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)13.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)11.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom93.0%21.1%Grok 4.20
BALROGNot measured10.1%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Vending-Bench 2$4,663Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond88.6%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)83.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.1%25.5%Grok 4.20
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)34.5%5.3%Grok 4.20
ARC-AGI89.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
ARC-AGI-265.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1095Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1090Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1141Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
AIME96.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
AA Math IndexNot measured3.3Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.3%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1126Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1128Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro86.3%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)54.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)63.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)74.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)94.5%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)32.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.7%Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1106Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1104Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1115Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1074Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1229Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: UI components1199Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: game dev1192Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: data viz1217Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: 3D1193Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1221Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: SVG1164Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1174Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)38.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)63.4%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
Vals Multimodal Index39.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
IFBench81.2%26.2%Grok 4.20
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%4.3%Grok 4.20
DTBench90.1%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LMCA38.7%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
CL-bench22.2%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
CL-bench Life11.9%Not measuredOnly Grok 4.20 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1110Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1089Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1094Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1180Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1019Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1017Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1056Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured949Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1105Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1100Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1096Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1083Only Llama 3.2 3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
BenchmarkGrok 4.20Llama 3.2 3B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.20$0.0025Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0002Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.20$0.070Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.0035Fits in one request

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.20$0.275Fits in one request
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct$0.013Exceeds the context window

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.20 and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.20Meta Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
MakerxAIMeta Llama
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 31, 2026September 25, 2024
Context window2M131K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.0505
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.3325
Coding index33.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.72Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.20 better than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for coding?

Only Grok 4.20 has a coding score, 33.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Llama 3.2 3B Instruct for output tokens 7.5x cheaper ($0.3325 vs $2.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Grok 4.20 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Llama 3.2 3B Instruct costs $0.0505 and $0.3325. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.20 or Llama 3.2 3B Instruct?

Grok 4.20, with 2M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Grok 4.20 vs Llama 3.2 3B Instruct comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Grok 4.20's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Llama 3.2 3B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next