gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus leads gpt-oss-120b on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.2 to 11.6, and gpt-oss-120b costs 2.6x less per output token ($0.50 vs $1.28 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 50 benchmarks have a result for both.
gpt-oss-120b or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick
Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-120b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($0.50 vs $1.28 per million).
- Shared results
- 50
- gpt-oss-120b only
- 31
- Qwen3.7 Plus only
- 25
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus leads, 25.2 against 11.6.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus leads, 17.5 against 3.7.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a GPQA Diamond result, 78.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a AIME result, 92.6%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has a MMLU Pro result, 79.2%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus leads, 1269 against 967.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.7 Plus
Qwen3.7 Plus takes 1M tokens against 131K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-120b
gpt-oss-120b $0.0003, Qwen3.7 Plus $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only gpt-oss-120b has the number, $0.51.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- gpt-oss-120b not benchmarked, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Web design, 38.3 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Design Arena: 3D: gpt-oss-120b 901 against Qwen3.7 Plus 1238, 42.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- gpt-oss-120b $0.50 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 2.6x apart.
- Context window
- gpt-oss-120b takes 131K tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | gpt-oss-120b | Bars | Qwen3.7 Plus | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 5 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 7 | ||
| Math | 0 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 6 | ||
| General | 0 | 21 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 50 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aider polyglot | 41.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SWE-bench Verified | 26.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AA Coding Index | 30.4 | 55.9 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 83.2% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 33.6% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 46.4% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | Not measured | 12.9% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 52.8% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 54.3% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 87.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| SciCode | 34.0% | 46.1% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 23.5% | 47.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Terminal-Bench | 18.7% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| FrontierCode | Not measured | 10.2% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| WeirdML | 48.2% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| ALE-Bench | 575.6 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1379 | 1473 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1387 | 1473 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| SciCode | 7.7% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 11.6 | 25.2 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 139.8 | 147.0 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 3.7 | 17.5 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | Not measured | 38.2% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.5% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 16.4% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 49.3% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 65.8% | 93.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| APEX-Agents | 4.4% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| METR time horizons | 56.6% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Not measured | 2.8% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -$22 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| BrowseComp-Plus | 67.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 78.5% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 78.2% | 90.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 19.6% | 35.6% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 75.8% | 87.9% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| SimpleBench | 22.1% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 2.0% | 17.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1364 | 1460 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1356 | 1466 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1368 | 1460 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | Not measured | 1292 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | Not measured | 1295 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 58.6% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 92.6% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MATH 500 (Vals AI) | 94.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MGSM (Vals AI) | 92.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AA Math Index | 93.4 | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 93.4% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 88.9% | 93.3% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | Not measured | 34.4% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1389 | 1467 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1386 | 1470 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 79.2% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 75.9% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 48.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 58.2% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 71.6% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | Not measured | 66.2% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| MedQA (Vals AI) | 91.4% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.8% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1382 | 1464 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1388 | 1464 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1355 | 1451 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1359 | 1435 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 967 | 1269 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Design Arena: UI components | 924 | 1258 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Design Arena: game dev | 992 | 1261 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Design Arena: data viz | 987 | 1276 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Design Arena: 3D | 901 | 1238 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 962 | 1269 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1208 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1143 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index021
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | Not measured | 39.3% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | Not measured | 53.9% | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| IFBench | 69.0% | 78.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 52.0% | 73.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| DTBench | 76.3% | 84.0% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMCA | 22.1% | 37.6% | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 77.1% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 25.0% | Not measured | Only gpt-oss-120b measured |
| LMArena Text | 1366 | 1454 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1318 | 1439 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1274 | 1438 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Vision | Not measured | 1278 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1375 | 1458 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1351 | 1445 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1385 | 1509 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: German | 1353 | 1471 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1331 | 1412 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1282 | 1413 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: French | 1370 | 1472 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1389 | 1457 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1343 | 1457 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1353 | 1449 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1340 | 1459 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1319 | 1454 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1306 | 1437 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1292 | 1422 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
| LMArena Vision: English | Not measured | 1280 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | Not measured | 1332 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | Not measured | 1288 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | Not measured | 1261 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | Not measured | 1258 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| LMArena Document | Not measured | 1444 | Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
gpt-oss-120b costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI gpt-oss-120b | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | August 5, 2025 | June 3, 2026 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $0.32 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $1.28 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | 33.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.51 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is gpt-oss-120b better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?
Only Qwen3.7 Plus has a coding score, 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; gpt-oss-120b has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick gpt-oss-120b for output tokens 2.6x cheaper ($0.50 vs $1.28 per million).
Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or Qwen3.7 Plus?
gpt-oss-120b costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for gpt-oss-120b only.
Which has the bigger context window, gpt-oss-120b or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks is the gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?
50 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. gpt-oss-120b's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.