Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct

GPT-6 Luna leads Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.1 to 7.3, and GPT-6 Luna costs 1.5x less per output token ($0.50 vs $0.75 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-6 LunaOpenAI
Coding
57.3
Overall
59.7
Output $/M
$0.50
3
Qwen3 VL 8B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct: which to pick

Only GPT-6 Luna has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
3
GPT-6 Luna only
101
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct only
8
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6 Luna 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 50.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GPT-6 Luna 83.3% against Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct 33.3%, 50.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6 Luna $0.50 against Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct $0.75 per million output tokens, 1.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6 LunaBarsQwen3 VL 8B InstructTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
General10
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
LiveBench coding84.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev1578Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)13.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)81.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Code migration (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
IOI (Vals AI)55.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured35.3%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
SciCode54.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured3.8%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ALE-Bench1576.9Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1425Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: React1574Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1595Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1571Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index38.17.3GPT-6 Luna
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1191Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1158Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1125Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench research43.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench browser72.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench long agentic48.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SREBench (Vals AI)2.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)49.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)19.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)61.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Vals Science Index28.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured29.2%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
APEX-Agents44.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SpireClimb0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
LiveBench reasoning81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.9%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)38.5%3.8%GPT-6 Luna
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI86.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI-259.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Chess puzzles36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1410Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: expert1439Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1411Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1245Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: homework1261Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured30.7Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.7%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tier 456.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ProofBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: math1410Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1428Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.9%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
SimpleQA Verified41.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: science1386Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1351Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1396Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1387Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite63.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
PRBench Legal42.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Design Arena: websites1270Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: UI components1295Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: game dev1257Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: data viz1217Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: 3D1219Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: all code categories1270Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: SVG1253Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1153Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench design82.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Vals Index52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench data analysis73.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
IFBenchNot measured39.9%Only Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%33.3%GPT-6 Luna
DTBench90.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMCA44.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Furniture assembly44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text1390Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1407Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1363Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision1216Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: English1394Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: non-English1381Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1426Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: German1376Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1369Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Korean1364Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: French1406Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1391Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Russian1393Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Polish1383Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1393Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1407Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1383Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1363Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: English1204Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1266Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1225Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1205Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0065Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.015Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct$0.058Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6 Luna and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6 LunaQwen3 VL 8B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026October 14, 2025
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.25
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.75
Coding index57.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it50
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct for coding?

Only GPT-6 Luna has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct costs $0.25 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Luna or Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct?

GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6 Luna vs Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-6 Luna's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next