Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6 Luna vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

GPT-6 Luna leads Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 38.1 to 26.5, at about the same output price ($0.50 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 16 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-6 LunaOpenAI
Coding
57.3
Overall
59.7
Output $/M
$0.50
15
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
1
vs boards won of 16 shared

GPT-6 Luna or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Only GPT-6 Luna has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for work measured by LiveBench research, where it leads.

Shared results
16
GPT-6 Luna only
88
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
0
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6 Luna 57.3 from 5 benchmarks, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 42.6 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveBench browser: GPT-6 Luna 72.0% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 4.0%, 68.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Both cost $0.50 per million output tokens.
Context window
GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6 LunaBarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work21
Reasoning20
Web design60
General20
All shared boards151
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench coding84.5%65.5%GPT-6 Luna
LMArena WebDev1578Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)13.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)81.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Code migration (Vals AI)42.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
IOI (Vals AI)55.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)37.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)76.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SciCode54.6%47.8%GPT-6 Luna
FrontierCode42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ALE-Bench1576.9Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: coding1437Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1423Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: React1573Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1595Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1571Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index38.126.5GPT-6 Luna
Epoch Capabilities Index156.8Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1191Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1158Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1131Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench research43.5%70.9%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LiveBench browser72.0%4.0%GPT-6 Luna
LiveBench long agentic48.1%15.8%GPT-6 Luna
SREBench (Vals AI)2.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)49.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)19.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)30.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)4.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)68.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)61.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)4.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Vals Science Index28.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
APEX-Agents44.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SpireClimb0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoning81.8%78.8%GPT-6 Luna
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)19.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)38.5%30.7%GPT-6 Luna
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)90.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI86.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ARC-AGI-259.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Chess puzzles36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1410Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: expert1442Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1410Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1245Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: homework1261Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
OTIS Mock AIME98.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 378.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FrontierMath, tier 456.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
ProofBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: math1409Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1427Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)44.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SimpleQA Verified41.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: science1386Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1352Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1400Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1388Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
FACTS Benchmark Suite63.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
PRBench Legal42.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websites12711173GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: UI components12951149GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: game dev12581110GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: data viz1217Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: 3D12181128GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: all code categories12701154GPT-6 Luna
Design Arena: SVG1253Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1153Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench design82.5%60.7%GPT-6 Luna
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Vals Index52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LiveBench data analysis73.4%64.6%GPT-6 Luna
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)57.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
SAGE (Vals AI)48.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)83.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%69.0%GPT-6 Luna
DTBench90.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMCA44.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Furniture assembly44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text1389Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1408Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1363Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision1216Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: English1393Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: non-English1381Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1427Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: German1376Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1369Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Korean1359Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: French1408Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1391Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Russian1392Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: Polish1383Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1392Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1408Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1384Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1364Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: English1204Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1266Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1225Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1205Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Luna measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0003Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.0065Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6 Luna$0.025Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

GPT-6 Luna costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6 Luna and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6 LunaNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerOpenAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 22, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.50
Coding index57.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it51
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Only GPT-6 Luna has a coding score, 57.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for work measured by LiveBench research, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Luna or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6 Luna vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

16 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-6 Luna's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next