GPT-6 Luna vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads GPT-6 Luna on coding, 82.2 to 57.4 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-6 Luna costs 20.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-6 Luna or Kimi K3.1 Pro: which to pick
Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.4 for GPT-6 Luna, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.
Pick GPT-6 Luna for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens).
- Shared results
- 34
- GPT-6 Luna only
- 71
- Kimi K3.1 Pro only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 82.2 against 57.4.
5 and 4 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads, 46.0 against 27.8.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads, 1325 against 1266.
Same board, both measured
General
Vals Index
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads, 62.5% against 52.3%.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-6 Luna
GPT-6 Luna $0.0003, Kimi K3.1 Pro $0.0070 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-6 Luna 57.4 from 5 benchmarks, Kimi K3.1 Pro 82.2 from 4 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 27.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): GPT-6 Luna 13.6% against Kimi K3.1 Pro 63.6%, 66.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-6 Luna $0.50 against Kimi K3.1 Pro $10.00 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens, Kimi K3.1 Pro 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-6 Luna | Bars | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 8 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 9 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 3 | ||
| Math | 0 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 7 | ||
| General | 0 | 3 | ||
| All shared boards | 2 | 32 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index18
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 84.5% | 81.8% | GPT-6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev | 1579 | 1695 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 13.6% | 63.6% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 81.7% | 84.9% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 42.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 55.6% | 81.9% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 73.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | 37.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 76.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| SciCode | 54.6% | 60.8% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| MirrorCode | 26.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1576.9 | 1932.8 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1437 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1425 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1575 | 1701 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1595 | 1706 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1571 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 27.8 | 46.0 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.8 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1188 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1158 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1134 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench research | 43.5% | 77.9% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| LiveBench browser | 70.3% | 75.9% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| LiveBench long agentic | 30.9% | 39.1% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 2.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 49.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 19.9% | 24.9% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 30.3% | 37.5% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | 4.2% | 11.7% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 68.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 61.5% | 75.6% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 4.3% | 31.4% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Vals Science Index | 28.4% | 44.4% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| APEX-Agents | 44.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| SpireClimb | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench reasoning | 81.8% | 91.1% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 19.4% | 26.1% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 38.5% | 52.5% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| ARC-AGI | 86.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 59.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Chess puzzles | 36.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 7.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1408 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1441 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1410 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1245 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1261 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 78.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 56.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| ProofBench | 64.0% | 91.0% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| LMArena Text: math | 1410 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1429 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| MathArena | Not measured | 59.6% | Only Kimi K3.1 Pro measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 44.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1387 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1355 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1396 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1384 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 62.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| PRBench Legal | 42.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1266 | 1325 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1292 | 1400 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1260 | 1410 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1214 | 1300 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1210 | 1451 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1265 | 1354 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1246 | 1328 | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1147 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench design | 82.5% | 77.8% | GPT-6 Luna |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vals Index | 52.3% | 62.5% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| LiveBench data analysis | 73.4% | 79.1% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 57.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 83.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 83.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.3% | 86.3% | Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| DTBench | 90.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMCA | 44.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Furniture assembly | 44.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text | 1389 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1406 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1362 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1216 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1394 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1380 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1430 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1378 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1368 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1356 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1406 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1391 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1390 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1380 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1393 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1407 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1383 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1362 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1204 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1266 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1225 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1205 | Not measured | Only GPT-6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-6 Luna costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-6 Luna | MoonshotAI Kimi K3.1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Moonshot AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 22, 2026 | October 23, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $10.00 |
| Coding index | 57.4 | 82.2 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 4 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-6 Luna better than Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding?
Pick Kimi K3.1 Pro for coding: it scores 82.2 on the Vibe Coding Index against 57.4 for GPT-6 Luna, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick GPT-6 Luna for output tokens 20.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens).
Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
GPT-6 Luna costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Luna or Kimi K3.1 Pro?
GPT-6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-6 Luna vs Kimi K3.1 Pro comparison based on?
34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. GPT-6 Luna's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Kimi K3.1 Pro's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.