Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4 preview

GPT-6.1 Terra leads Hy4 preview on coding, 77.4 to 44.3 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Hy4 preview costs 2.0x less per output token ($2.501 vs $5.00 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
Coding
77.4
Overall
76.8
Output $/M
$5.00
6
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
44.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
3
vs boards won of 9 shared

GPT-6.1 Terra or Hy4 preview: which to pick

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview.

Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
9
GPT-6.1 Terra only
27
Hy4 preview only
15
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6.1 Terra 77.4 from 4 benchmarks, Hy4 preview 44.3 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 14.6 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI): GPT-6.1 Terra 49.5% against Hy4 preview 8.1%, 55.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-6.1 Terra $5.00 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-6.1 Terra takes 1.05M tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-6.1 TerraBarsHy4 previewTies
Coding50
Agentic work03
General10
All shared boards63
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraHy4 previewLeader
LiveBench coding94.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena WebDev16731631GPT-6.1 Terra
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)49.5%8.1%GPT-6.1 Terra
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)84.0%77.5%GPT-6.1 Terra
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
SciCode55.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
ALE-Bench2608.8Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena WebDev: React16571653GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev: HTML17191620GPT-6.1 Terra
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraHy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index51.0Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraHy4 previewLeader
LiveBench research73.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench browser93.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench long agentic48.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)15.2%32.6%Hy4 preview
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)26.0%45.2%Hy4 preview
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)1.7%8.8%Hy4 preview
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
APEX-Agents68.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraHy4 previewLeader
LiveBench reasoning88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)46.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)94.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Mystery game puzzles74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
EBR-bench78.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)35.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraHy4 previewLeader
OTIS Mock AIME100.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 390.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tier 492.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
ProofBenchNot measured75.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraHy4 previewLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
SimpleQA Verified57.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraHy4 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1283Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Design Arena: UI components1277Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Design Arena: game dev1348Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Design Arena: all code categories1295Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench design82.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraHy4 previewLeader
Vals Index60.5%53.2%GPT-6.1 Terra
LiveBench data analysis82.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)82.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Furniture assembly79.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
MultiChallenge74.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 TerraHy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.0035Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.065Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra$0.250Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6.1 Terra and Hy4 preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6.1 TerraTencent Hy4 preview
MakerOpenAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 26, 2026August 28, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.834
Output $/Mtok$5.00$2.501
Coding index77.444.3
Independent measurements behind it43
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6.1 Terra better than Hy4 preview for coding?

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.3 for Hy4 preview. Pick Hy4 preview for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($2.501 vs $5.00 per million) and work measured by Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) or Legal Research Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or Hy4 preview?

GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $5.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6.1 Terra or Hy4 preview?

GPT-6.1 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. GPT-6.1 Terra's coding index rests on 4 independent benchmarks and Hy4 preview's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-tencent-hy4-preview" title="GPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4 preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-6-1-terra-vs-tencent-hy4-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-6.1 Terra vs Hy4 preview</a></p>