GPT-5.6 Luna vs Mistral Large 4
Updated October 21, 2026. 79 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.
Decision reading
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for coding: it scores 61.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.3 for Mistral Large 4.
Pick Mistral Large 4 when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.
- Shared results
- 79
- GPT-5.6 Luna only
- 37
- Mistral Large 4 only
- 2
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, four public coding benchmarks
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna scores 61.5 against 55.3.
2 benchmarks behind each score
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 leads, 38.4 against 37.3.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a AA Agentic Index result, 42.1.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a GPQA Diamond result, 91.7%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has a MMLU Pro result, 86.0%.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Mistral Large 4
Mistral Large 4 leads, 1258 against 1256.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna $0.0008, Mistral Large 4 $0.0034 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.6 Luna has the number, $0.04.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.6 Luna 61.5 from 2 benchmarks, Mistral Large 4 55.3 from 2 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 18.4 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LiveBench browser: GPT-5.6 Luna 68.0% against Mistral Large 4 8.0%, 60.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.6 Luna $1.20 against Mistral Large 4 $4.18 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5.6 Luna takes 1.05M tokens, Mistral Large 4 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.6 Luna | Bars | Mistral Large 4 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 7 | 7 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 6 | 2 | ||
| Reasoning | 9 | 1 | ||
| Math | 4 | 1 | 1 tie | |
| Knowledge | 3 | 3 | ||
| Web design | 1 | 8 | ||
| General | 14 | 10 | ||
| All shared boards | 45 | 33 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index77
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 73.6% | 60.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev | 1518 | 1543 | Mistral Large 4 |
| AA Coding Index | 71.4 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 93.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | 11.6% | 27.8% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 77.1% | 78.4% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 44.5% | 30.6% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| IOI (Vals AI) | 61.8% | 45.3% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 79.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI) | Not measured | 33.1% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | 22.6% | 14.3% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 60.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | 73.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SciCode | 53.6% | 54.2% | Mistral Large 4 |
| FrontierCode | 39.8% | 39.4% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| WeirdML | 60.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1667.4 | 1213.2 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1466 | 1478 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1463 | 1467 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1508 | 1559 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1520 | 1487 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1517 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 37.3 | 38.4 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 156.5 | 150.0 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index62
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 42.1 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench research | 51.0% | 28.1% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LiveBench browser | 68.0% | 8.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LiveBench long agentic | 30.4% | 11.8% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 1.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 55.0% | 54.7% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 24.8% | 30.4% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 36.5% | 31.7% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI) | Not measured | 17.5% | Only Mistral Large 4 measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 67.1% | 56.2% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| BioMysteryBench (Vals AI) | 61.5% | 67.0% | Mistral Large 4 |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | 0.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vals Science Index | 25.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| APEX-Agents | 43.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| BALROG | 45.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $4,095 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index91
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 91.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LiveBench reasoning | 85.6% | 83.9% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| MysteryMechanism (Vals AI) | 14.4% | 12.2% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 85.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.5% | 35.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 91.6% | 88.1% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| ARC-AGI | 88.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 59.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SimpleBench | 46.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Chess puzzles | 43.0% | 33.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Mystery game puzzles | 21.0% | 17.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1451 | 1444 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1478 | 1444 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1460 | 1442 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1273 | 1288 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1282 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 98.3% | 98.3% | Tie |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 82.1% | 58.6% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 61.0% | 26.8% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| ProofBench | 60.0% | 10.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: math | 1459 | 1469 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1470 | 1462 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 86.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 84.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 64.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 76.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 67.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 42.4% | 40.7% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.0% | 20.0% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: science | 1433 | 1448 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1399 | 1433 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1446 | 1425 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1439 | 1439 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1256 | 1258 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1250 | 1275 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1196 | 1226 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1212 | 1274 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1121 | 1253 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1231 | 1259 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1193 | 1232 | Mistral Large 4 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1144 | 1203 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LiveBench design | 76.0% | 65.6% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1410
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench data analysis | 78.0% | 76.5% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI) | 61.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 44.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 84.4% | 80.4% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 69.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 83.7% | 81.3% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| DTBench | 89.1% | 88.2% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMCA | 48.5% | 35.8% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 61.9% | 28.1% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| Furniture assembly | 42.5% | 20.8% | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text | 1431 | 1431 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1437 | 1422 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1396 | 1363 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Vision | 1257 | 1272 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1441 | 1433 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1417 | 1422 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1470 | 1492 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1455 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1415 | 1415 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1415 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1458 | 1492 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1446 | 1455 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1427 | 1417 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1405 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1434 | 1435 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1436 | 1428 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1419 | 1386 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1402 | 1378 | GPT-5.6 Luna |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1263 | 1283 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1294 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1264 | 1284 | Mistral Large 4 |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1190 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1257 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| LMArena Document | 1457 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.6 Luna measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.6 Luna | Mistral Large 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 9, 2026 | October 6, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.20 | $1.36 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.20 | $4.18 |
| Coding index | 61.5 | 55.3 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 2 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.04 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.6 Luna better than Mistral Large 4 for coding?
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna for coding: it scores 61.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 55.3 for Mistral Large 4. Pick Mistral Large 4 when what matters is LMArena WebDev or Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI), where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Mistral Large 4?
GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 costs $1.36 and $4.18. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.6 Luna only.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.6 Luna or Mistral Large 4?
GPT-5.6 Luna, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.6 Luna vs Mistral Large 4 comparison based on?
79 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.6 Luna's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 4's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.