GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.5 leads GPT-5.6 Terra on coding, 71.3 to 63.9 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.6 Terra costs 2.5x less per output token ($12.00 vs $30.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 120 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-5.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra: which to pick
Pick GPT-5.5 for coding: it scores 71.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 63.9 for GPT-5.6 Terra, though on 5 benchmarks against 6.
Pick GPT-5.6 Terra for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($12.00 vs $30.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.42 against $1.65).
- Shared results
- 120
- GPT-5.5 only
- 14
- GPT-5.6 Terra only
- 7
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 scores 71.3 against 63.9.
5 and 6 benchmarks behind the scores
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra leads, 42.1 against 38.4.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra leads, 43.2 against 36.4.
Same board, both measured
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads, 93.2% against 90.9%.
Same board, both measured
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
GPT-5.5
GPT-5.5 leads, 88.1% against 86.7%.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.6 Terra leads, 1268 against 1256.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 1.05M tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.5 $0.020, GPT-5.6 Terra $0.0080 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
GPT-5.6 Terra
GPT-5.5 $1.65, GPT-5.6 Terra $0.42.
Published attempt cost and pass rate
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.5 71.3 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Terra 63.9 from 6 benchmarks.
- Widest category
- Math, 8.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Kagi LLM Benchmark: GPT-5.5 88.8% against GPT-5.6 Terra 51.3%, 37.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.5 $30.00 against GPT-5.6 Terra $12.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 1.05M tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.5 | Bars | GPT-5.6 Terra | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 7 | 12 | 1 tie | |
| Intelligence | 0 | 2 | ||
| Agentic work | 7 | 12 | ||
| Reasoning | 14 | 3 | ||
| Math | 3 | 3 | ||
| Knowledge | 11 | 1 | ||
| Web design | 7 | 2 | ||
| General | 32 | 3 | ||
| All shared boards | 81 | 38 | 1 tie |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index712
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench coding | 85.1% | 86.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena WebDev | 1513 | 1522 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| AA Coding Index | 74.9 | 76.7 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 85.3% | 85.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 82.6% | 95.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 22.7% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 69.8% | 74.6% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 45.2% | 47.8% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| ProgramBench (Vals AI) | 0.5% | 0.5% | Tie |
| IOI (Vals AI) | Not measured | 87.6% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 76.4% | 77.5% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI) | Not measured | 14.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| SkillsBench (Vals AI) | 62.5% | 58.9% | GPT-5.5 |
| CyberBench (Vals AI) | Not measured | 72.1% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| SciCode | 56.1% | 55.0% | GPT-5.5 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 60.6% | 62.9% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Terminal-Bench | 84.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| FrontierCode | 43.0% | 41.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| GSO-Bench | 40.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| WeirdML | 84.9% | 78.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| MirrorCode | 10.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1943.0 | 1951.4 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1494 | 1485 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1493 | 1482 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1506 | 1513 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1543 | 1526 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1532 | 1541 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| SciCode | Not measured | 10.8% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 38.4 | 42.1 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 159.7 | 160.1 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index712
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 36.4 | 43.2 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1117 | 1120 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1089 | 1061 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1142 | 1111 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1164 | 1062 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 1173 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1179 | 1083 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1017 | 1058 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1084 | 1105 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LiveBench research | 61.6% | 60.4% | GPT-5.5 |
| LiveBench browser | 48.0% | 84.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LiveBench long agentic | 44.6% | 48.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| SREBench (Vals AI) | 3.8% | 9.5% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 51.8% | 54.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 21.8% | 30.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 40.4% | 41.4% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 64.5% | 66.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI) | Not measured | 10.0% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| Time Horizon Index (Vals AI) | 8.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 93.9% | 86.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| APEX-Agents | 55.1% | 58.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Remote Labor Index | 6.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 13.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| BALROG | Not measured | 53.2% | Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured |
| DeepResearch Bench | 54.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| PostTrainBench | 27.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | $7,524 | $7,343 | GPT-5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index143
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.2% | 90.9% | GPT-5.5 |
| LiveBench reasoning | 89.7% | 90.6% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 88.3% | 86.5% | GPT-5.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 93.5% | 92.5% | GPT-5.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 45.8% | 42.9% | GPT-5.5 |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 90.7% | 93.3% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| ARC-AGI | 95.0% | 96.5% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 85.0% | 83.9% | GPT-5.5 |
| SimpleBench | 69.0% | 48.9% | GPT-5.5 |
| Chess puzzles | 63.0% | 47.0% | GPT-5.5 |
| Mystery game puzzles | 56.0% | 35.0% | GPT-5.5 |
| EBR-bench | 34.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1489 | 1469 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1507 | 1496 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1483 | 1465 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1325 | 1295 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1332 | 1312 | GPT-5.5 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 88.8% | 51.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 84.4% | 99.7% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 85.3% | 86.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 72.5% | 70.7% | GPT-5.5 |
| ProofBench | 50.0% | 74.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| LMArena Text: math | 1487 | 1465 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1496 | 1478 | GPT-5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index111
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 88.1% | 86.7% | GPT-5.5 |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 86.5% | 85.1% | GPT-5.5 |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 66.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.5 measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 68.4% | 65.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 75.0% | 76.2% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 68.8% | 67.3% | GPT-5.5 |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 49.1% | 43.4% | GPT-5.5 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 63.0% | 43.2% | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1485 | 1452 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1465 | 1430 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1491 | 1461 | GPT-5.5 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1478 | 1448 | GPT-5.5 |
| FACTS Benchmark Suite | 66.7% | 52.0% | GPT-5.5 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index72
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1256 | 1268 | GPT-5.6 Terra |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1257 | 1256 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1293 | 1229 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1264 | 1240 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1197 | 1134 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1260 | 1241 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1234 | 1219 | GPT-5.5 |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1255 | 1177 | GPT-5.5 |
| LiveBench design | 70.3% | 76.0% | GPT-5.6 Terra |
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index323
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.6 Terra | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.5 | OpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | April 24, 2026 | July 9, 2026 |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $5.00 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $30.00 | $12.00 |
| Coding index | 71.3 | 63.9 |
| Independent measurements behind it | 5 | 6 |
| Cost per solved task | $1.65 | $0.42 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.5 better than GPT-5.6 Terra for coding?
Pick GPT-5.5 for coding: it scores 71.3 on the Vibe Coding Index against 63.9 for GPT-5.6 Terra, though on 5 benchmarks against 6. Pick GPT-5.6 Terra for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($12.00 vs $30.00 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.42 against $1.65).
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
GPT-5.5 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $30.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Terra costs $2.00 and $12.00. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.5 costs $1.65 and GPT-5.6 Terra $0.42.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.5 or GPT-5.6 Terra?
Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra comparison based on?
120 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.5's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-5.6 Terra's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.