Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview leads GPT-5.4 Nano on coding, 61.1 to 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.4 Nano costs 2.2x less per output token ($1.25 vs $2.70 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 41 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI
Coding
44.8
Overall
45.7
Output $/M
$1.25
0
Step 5 PreviewStepFun
Coding
61.1
Overall
60.5
Output $/M
$2.70
41
vs boards won of 41 shared

GPT-5.4 Nano or Step 5 Preview: which to pick

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano.

Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($1.25 vs $2.70 per million).

Shared results
41
GPT-5.4 Nano only
44
Step 5 Preview only
20
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks, Step 5 Preview 61.1 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 23.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GPT-5.4 Nano 26.1% against Step 5 Preview 70.4%, 44.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 against Step 5 Preview $2.70 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Nano takes 400K tokens, Step 5 Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 NanoBarsStep 5 PreviewTies
Coding05
Intelligence01
Agentic work04
Reasoning06
Math03
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards041
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index05
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured85.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1567Only Step 5 Preview measured
AA Coding Index56.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured31.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)26.1%70.4%Step 5 Preview
Code migration (Vals AI)14.5%39.0%Step 5 Preview
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)41.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured40.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SciCode47.2%58.9%Step 5 Preview
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
WeirdML49.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ALE-Bench1004.5Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: coding14041485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14021473Step 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1583Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1556Only Step 5 Preview measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1550Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.743.7Step 5 Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index146.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoStep 5 PreviewLeader
AA Agentic Index16.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveBench researchNot measured72.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench browserNot measured24.0%Only Step 5 Preview measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)38.2%50.7%Step 5 Preview
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.0%27.3%Step 5 Preview
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)6.3%40.4%Step 5 Preview
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)44.8%57.1%Step 5 Preview
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.4%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured29.6%Only Step 5 Preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom76.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoStep 5 PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured83.8%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)73.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.3%46.5%Step 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)78.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI51.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI-25.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Mystery game puzzles9.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13811461Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: expert13961485Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13871454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: diagrams12101308Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: homework12251265Step 5 Preview
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoStep 5 PreviewLeader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 344.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ProofBench5.0%42.0%Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: math14051458Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14091460Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoStep 5 PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro77.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SimpleQA Verified11.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: science13741454Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13691439Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: legal and government13681437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13661435Step 5 Preview
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench designNot measured76.9%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoStep 5 PreviewLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured63.5%Only Step 5 Preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Step 5 Preview measured
SAGE (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Vals Multimodal Index47.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
IFBench75.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.7%88.3%Step 5 Preview
DTBench80.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMCA36.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text13721440Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13621438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: creative writing13151409Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision11961265Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: English13811447Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: non-English13591428Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Chinese13911500Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: German1368Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Japanese13431383Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Korean1321Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: French13951438Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Spanish13711441Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Russian13631433Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: Polish1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13821437Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13651449Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13381425Step 5 Preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13251412Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: English12021290Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: Chinese1232Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12041282Step 5 Preview
LMArena Vision: humor1161Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1159Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoStep 5 PreviewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.0008Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.0024Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.014Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.058Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.052Fits in one request
Step 5 Preview$0.227Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Nano and Step 5 Preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 NanoStepFun Step 5 Preview
MakerOpenAIStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026October 8, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$1.00
Output $/Mtok$1.25$2.70
Coding index44.861.1
Independent measurements behind it24
Cost per solved task$0.14Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than Step 5 Preview for coding?

Pick Step 5 Preview for coding: it scores 61.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano. Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 2.2x cheaper ($1.25 vs $2.70 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Step 5 Preview?

GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 and $2.70. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Nano only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Nano vs Step 5 Preview comparison based on?

41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4 Nano's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Step 5 Preview's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview" title="GPT-5.4 Nano vs Step 5 Preview, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-stepfun-step-5-preview">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 Nano vs Step 5 Preview</a></p>