Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads GPT-5.4 Nano on coding, 54.1 to 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, and GPT-5.4 Nano costs 3.5x less per output token ($1.25 vs $4.425 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace GPT-5.4 Nano Replace Qwen3.7 Max
GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI
Coding
44.8
Overall
45.7
Output $/M
$1.25
4
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen
Coding
54.1
Overall
61.7
Output $/M
$4.425
34
vs boards won of 38 shared

GPT-5.4 Nano or Qwen3.7 Max: which to pick

Pick Qwen3.7 Max for coding: it scores 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano.

Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($1.25 vs $4.425 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.14 against $4.69).

Model AGPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI44.8/1002 independent benchmarks$0.14 per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 MaxQwen54.1/1003 independent benchmarks$4.69 per solved task
Shared results
38
GPT-5.4 Nano only
47
Qwen3.7 Max only
22
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Max 54.1 from 3 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 17.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SimpleQA Verified: GPT-5.4 Nano 11.7% against Qwen3.7 Max 55.8%, 44.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 against Qwen3.7 Max $4.425 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Nano takes 400K tokens, Qwen3.7 Max 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 NanoBarsQwen3.7 MaxTies
Coding27
Intelligence02
Agentic work06
Reasoning15
Math04
Knowledge15
General05
All shared boards434
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index27
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 MaxLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1515Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
AA Coding Index56.166.0Qwen3.7 Max
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.0%87.1%Qwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)69.8%68.8%GPT-5.4 Nano
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)26.1%47.7%Qwen3.7 Max
Code migration (Vals AI)14.5%13.1%GPT-5.4 Nano
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)41.6%61.0%Qwen3.7 Max
SciCode47.2%49.5%Qwen3.7 Max
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%50.8%Qwen3.7 Max
WeirdML49.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ALE-Bench1004.51189.4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text: coding1404Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1402Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1514Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1512Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.729.5Qwen3.7 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index146.0154.0Qwen3.7 Max
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Agentic Index16.022.5Qwen3.7 Max
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1191Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1154Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1159Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1187Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1161Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1098Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1169Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)38.2%47.8%Qwen3.7 Max
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.0%15.8%Qwen3.7 Max
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)6.3%25.5%Qwen3.7 Max
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)44.8%57.0%Qwen3.7 Max
τ²-Bench Telecom76.0%94.7%Qwen3.7 Max
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 MaxLeader
GPQA Diamond77.5%90.2%Qwen3.7 Max
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)73.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.7%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.3%40.5%Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)78.5%90.9%Qwen3.7 Max
ARC-AGI51.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI-25.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SimpleBenchNot measured70.4%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Chess puzzles45.0%26.0%GPT-5.4 Nano
Mystery game puzzles9.0%32.0%Qwen3.7 Max
EBR-benchNot measured9.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1381Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: expert1396Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1387Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1210Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: homework1225Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME87.8%95.6%Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 344.9%64.6%Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%34.1%Qwen3.7 Max
ProofBench5.0%26.0%Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text: math1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1409Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 MaxLeader
MMLU Pro77.2%89.3%Qwen3.7 Max
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.9%84.9%Qwen3.7 Max
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.2%63.7%Qwen3.7 Max
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.4%75.3%Qwen3.7 Max
MortgageTax (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.0%38.8%GPT-5.4 Nano
SimpleQA Verified11.7%55.8%Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text: science1374Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1369Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1368Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1274Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1267Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1265Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1276Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1265Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1275Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1216Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1211Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 MaxLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.1%79.4%Qwen3.7 Max
Vals Multimodal Index47.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
IFBench75.9%80.5%Qwen3.7 Max
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.7%79.0%Qwen3.7 Max
DTBench80.3%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max
LMCA36.9%44.0%Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text1372Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1362Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1315Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision1196Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: English1381Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: non-English1359Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1391Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: German1368Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1343Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Korean1321Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: French1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1371Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Russian1363Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Polish1366Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1382Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1365Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1338Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1325Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: English1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1232Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1204Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: humor1161Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1159Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1110Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.0008Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.0037Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.014Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.087Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.052Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.339Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Nano costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Nano and Qwen3.7 Max
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 NanoQwen3.7 Max
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026May 21, 2026
Context window400K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.20$1.475
Output $/Mtok$1.25$4.425
Coding index44.854.1
Independent measurements behind it23
Cost per solved task$0.14$4.69
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than Qwen3.7 Max for coding?

Pick Qwen3.7 Max for coding: it scores 54.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 44.8 for GPT-5.4 Nano. Pick GPT-5.4 Nano for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($1.25 vs $4.425 per million) and a lower cost per solved task ($0.14 against $4.69).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Qwen3.7 Max?

GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.475 and $4.425. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.14 and Qwen3.7 Max $4.69.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max, with 1M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4 Nano's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Max's on 3. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-qwen3-7-max" title="GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.7 Max, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-nano-vs-qwen3-7-max">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen3.7 Max</a></p>