GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen-Plus
Qwen-Plus costs 1.6x less per output token than GPT-5.4 Nano ($0.78 vs $1.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-5.4 Nano or Qwen-Plus: which to pick
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen-Plus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Qwen-Plus for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.78 vs $1.25 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 400K tokens).
- Shared results
- 27
- GPT-5.4 Nano only
- 58
- Qwen-Plus only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a AA Intelligence Index result, 20.7.
Directional only
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a AA Agentic Index result, 16.0.
Directional only
Reasoning
GPQA Diamond
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a GPQA Diamond result, 77.5%.
Directional only
Math
AIME
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a AIME result, 88.8%.
Directional only
Knowledge
MMLU Pro
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a MMLU Pro result, 77.2%.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen-Plus
Qwen-Plus takes 1M tokens against 400K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen-Plus
GPT-5.4 Nano $0.0008, Qwen-Plus $0.0006 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has the number, $0.14.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen-Plus not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 32.0 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-5.4 Nano 87.8% against Qwen-Plus 17.8%, 70.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 against Qwen-Plus $0.78 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5.4 Nano takes 400K tokens, Qwen-Plus 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.4 Nano | Bars | Qwen-Plus | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 4 | 0 | ||
| Math | 3 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| General | 13 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 26 | 1 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 56.1 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 84.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) | 69.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 26.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Code migration (Vals AI) | 14.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI) | 41.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| SciCode | 47.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 42.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| WeirdML | 49.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1004.5 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1404 | 1328 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1402 | 1343 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 20.7 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.0 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 16.0 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Finance Agent (Vals AI) | 38.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI) | 5.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Legal Research Bench (Vals AI) | 6.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI) | 44.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 76.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 77.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MMMU Pro (Vals AI) | 73.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 81.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 28.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 78.5% | 48.1% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| ARC-AGI | 51.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Chess puzzles | 45.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 9.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1381 | 1317 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1396 | 1328 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1387 | 1333 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1210 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1225 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 39.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIME | 88.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 87.8% | 17.8% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3 | 44.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| FrontierMath, tier 4 | 12.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| ProofBench | 5.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MATH level 5 | Not measured | 65.3% | Only Qwen-Plus measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1405 | 1326 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1409 | 1332 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro | 77.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LegalBench (Vals AI) | 77.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| CaseLaw (Vals AI) | 51.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| CorpFin (Vals AI) | 61.2% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| TaxEval (Vals AI) | 67.4% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MortgageTax (Vals AI) | 59.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MedCode (Vals AI) | 41.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| SimpleQA Verified | 11.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1374 | 1352 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1369 | 1350 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1368 | 1349 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1366 | 1303 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index131
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAGE (Vals AI) | 38.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| MedScribe (Vals AI) | 77.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Vals Multimodal Index | 47.6% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| IFBench | 75.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 76.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| DTBench | 80.3% | 81.1% | Qwen-Plus |
| LMCA | 36.9% | 24.0% | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text | 1372 | 1326 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1362 | 1303 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1315 | 1292 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Vision | 1196 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1381 | 1339 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1359 | 1310 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1391 | 1347 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: German | 1368 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1343 | 1251 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1321 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1395 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1371 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1363 | 1323 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1366 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1382 | 1336 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1365 | 1324 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1338 | 1296 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1325 | 1270 | GPT-5.4 Nano |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1202 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1232 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1204 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1161 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1141 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1159 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.4 Nano measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen-Plus costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
GPT-5.4 Nano costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.4 Nano | Qwen-Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | March 17, 2026 | February 1, 2025 |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.20 | $0.26 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.25 | $0.78 |
| Coding index | 44.8 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.14 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than Qwen-Plus for coding?
Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen-Plus has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen-Plus for output tokens 1.6x cheaper ($0.78 vs $1.25 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 400K tokens).
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Qwen-Plus?
GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Qwen-Plus costs $0.26 and $0.78. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Nano only.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or Qwen-Plus?
Qwen-Plus, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Nano vs Qwen-Plus comparison based on?
27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4 Nano's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen-Plus's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.