Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Nano vs Nemotron 3 Super

GPT-5.4 Nano leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 20.7 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 2.8x less per output token ($0.45 vs $1.25 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace GPT-5.4 Nano Replace Nemotron 3 Super
GPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI
Coding
44.8
Overall
45.7
Output $/M
$1.25
24
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
14
vs boards won of 38 shared

GPT-5.4 Nano or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 2.8x cheaper ($0.45 vs $1.25 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: software and IT or LMArena Text: hard prompts, where it leads.

Model AGPT-5.4 NanoOpenAI44.8/1002 independent benchmarks$0.14 per solved taskModel BNemotron 3 SuperNVIDIANot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task
Shared results
38
GPT-5.4 Nano only
47
Nemotron 3 Super only
1
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Nano 44.8 from 2 benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 11.7 points apart on average over 7 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
ALE-Bench: GPT-5.4 Nano 1004.5 against Nemotron 3 Super 213.9, 26.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Nano $1.25 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 2.8x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Nano takes 400K tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 NanoBarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding61
Intelligence10
Agentic work20
Reasoning23
Math20
Knowledge13
General107
All shared boards2414
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index61
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Coding Index56.137.7GPT-5.4 Nano
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)84.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)69.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)26.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Code migration (Vals AI)14.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)41.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SciCode47.2%36.2%GPT-5.4 Nano
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%28.8%GPT-5.4 Nano
WeirdML49.2%38.0%GPT-5.4 Nano
ALE-Bench1004.5213.9GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: coding14041403GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: software and IT14021409Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.712.8GPT-5.4 Nano
Epoch Capabilities Index146.0Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic Index16.01.7GPT-5.4 Nano
Finance Agent (Vals AI)38.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)5.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)44.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
τ²-Bench Telecom76.0%67.8%GPT-5.4 Nano
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoNemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond77.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)73.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.7%80.0%GPT-5.4 Nano
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.3%20.8%GPT-5.4 Nano
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)78.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI51.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ARC-AGI-25.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Chess puzzles45.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Mystery game puzzles9.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13811386Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: expert13961398Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13871397Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Vision: diagrams1210Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: homework1225Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark39.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AIME88.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
OTIS Mock AIME87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 344.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
FrontierMath, tier 412.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
ProofBench5.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: math14051380GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: mathematical work14091405GPT-5.4 Nano
MathArenaNot measured16.6%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoNemotron 3 SuperLeader
MMLU Pro77.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)77.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)61.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)67.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)59.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedCode (Vals AI)41.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
SimpleQA Verified11.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: science13741387Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13691383Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: legal and government13681392Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: business and finance13661364GPT-5.4 Nano
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index107
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoNemotron 3 SuperLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)38.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)77.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Vals Multimodal Index47.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
IFBench75.9%71.5%GPT-5.4 Nano
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.7%65.7%GPT-5.4 Nano
DTBench80.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMCA36.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text13721378Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: instruction following13621347GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: creative writing13151317Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Vision1196Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: English13811400Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: non-English13591356GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: Chinese13911431Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: German13681341GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: Japanese1343Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: Korean1321Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Text: French13951403Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Spanish13711418Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text: Russian13631336GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: Polish13661346GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: multi-turn13821369GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: longer queries13651362GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: writing and language13381332GPT-5.4 Nano
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13251336Nemotron 3 Super
LMArena Vision: English1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1232Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1204Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: humor1161Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1141Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1159Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Nano measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 NanoNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.0008Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.014Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Nano$0.052Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Nano and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 NanoNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerOpenAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026March 11, 2026
Context window400K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.20$0.085
Output $/Mtok$1.25$0.45
Coding index44.8Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.14Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Nano better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Only GPT-5.4 Nano has a coding score, 44.8 on the Vibe Coding Index; Nemotron 3 Super has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 2.8x cheaper ($0.45 vs $1.25 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: software and IT or LMArena Text: hard prompts, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Nano or Nemotron 3 Super?

GPT-5.4 Nano costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Nano only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Nano or Nemotron 3 Super?

GPT-5.4 Nano, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Nano vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.4 Nano's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next