Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Plus

GPT-5.4 Mini leads Qwen3.7 Plus on coding, 35.8 to 33.2 on the Vibe Coding Index, and Qwen3.7 Plus costs 3.5x less per output token ($1.28 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 64 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace GPT-5.4 Mini Replace Qwen3.7 Plus
GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
35.8
Overall
24.1
Output $/M
$4.50
15
Qwen3.7 PlusQwen
Coding
33.2
Overall
25.2
Output $/M
$1.28
49
vs boards won of 64 shared

GPT-5.4 Mini or Qwen3.7 Plus: which to pick

Pick GPT-5.4 Mini for coding: it scores 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($1.28 vs $4.50 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 400K tokens).

Model AGPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI35.8/1005 independent benchmarks$0.70 per solved taskModel BQwen3.7 PlusQwen33.2/1002 independent benchmarksNo cost per solved task
Shared results
64
GPT-5.4 Mini only
24
Qwen3.7 Plus only
11
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks, Qwen3.7 Plus 33.2 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 9.1 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierCode: GPT-5.4 Mini 27.0% against Qwen3.7 Plus 10.2%, 25.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 against Qwen3.7 Plus $1.28 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens, Qwen3.7 Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 MiniBarsQwen3.7 PlusTies
Coding72
Intelligence11
Agentic work24
Reasoning09
Math13
Knowledge05
General425
All shared boards1549
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index72
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 PlusLeader
LMArena WebDev1397Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
AA Coding Index56.155.9GPT-5.4 Mini
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.0%46.4%GPT-5.4 Mini
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%12.9%GPT-5.4 Mini
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%52.8%GPT-5.4 Mini
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured54.3%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
SciCode52.1%46.1%GPT-5.4 Mini
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)52.3%47.0%GPT-5.4 Mini
FrontierCode27.0%10.2%GPT-5.4 Mini
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1188.6Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding14381473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: software and IT14361473Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1419Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.125.2Qwen3.7 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index148.7147.0GPT-5.4 Mini
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AA Agentic Index17.917.5GPT-5.4 Mini
Finance Agent (Vals AI)45.4%38.2%GPT-5.4 Mini
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)8.8%10.5%Qwen3.7 Plus
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)12.5%16.4%Qwen3.7 Plus
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)45.4%49.3%Qwen3.7 Plus
τ²-Bench Telecom83.3%93.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0Not measured2.8%Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
DeepResearch Bench36.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index09
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%90.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.1%35.6%Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.9%87.9%Qwen3.7 Plus
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-218.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles11.0%17.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts14241460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: expert14351466Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14201460Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: diagrams12661292Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: homework12851295Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 PlusLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%93.3%Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 351.2%34.4%GPT-5.4 Mini
FrontierMath, tier 49.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProofBench21.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math14181467Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: mathematical work14291470Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 PlusLeader
MMLU Pro84.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)63.5%66.2%Qwen3.7 Plus
SimpleQA Verified29.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science14171464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13951464Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: legal and government14141451Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: business and finance14181435Qwen3.7 Plus
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1261Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1262Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1276Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1239Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1143Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index425
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 PlusLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)50.8%39.3%GPT-5.4 Mini
Vals Multimodal Index54.2%53.9%GPT-5.4 Mini
IFBench73.3%78.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.0%73.0%GPT-5.4 Mini
DTBench80.0%84.0%Qwen3.7 Plus
LMCA40.8%37.6%GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text14121454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: instruction following14051439Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: creative writing13701438Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12451278Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: English14121458Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: non-English14051445Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Chinese14461509Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: German14081471Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Japanese13751412Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Korean13701413Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: French14411472Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Spanish14051457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Russian14171457Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: Polish14151449Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: multi-turn14291459Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: longer queries14081454Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: writing and language13931437Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13731422Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: English12441280Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: Chinese12861332Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: reading text12531288Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: humor12351261Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12221258Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena DocumentNot measured1444Only Qwen3.7 Plus measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.0030Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.051Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Plus$0.077Fits in one request

Qwen3.7 Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Plus
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 Plus
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026June 3, 2026
Context window400K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.75$0.32
Output $/Mtok$4.50$1.28
Coding index35.833.2
Independent measurements behind it52
Cost per solved task$0.70Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Mini better than Qwen3.7 Plus for coding?

Pick GPT-5.4 Mini for coding: it scores 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.2 for Qwen3.7 Plus. Pick Qwen3.7 Plus for output tokens 3.5x cheaper ($1.28 vs $4.50 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 400K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Mini or Qwen3.7 Plus?

GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus costs $0.32 and $1.28. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Mini or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus, with 1M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Plus comparison based on?

64 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.4 Mini's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.7 Plus's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-qwen3-7-plus" title="GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Plus, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-qwen3-7-plus">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Plus</a></p>