LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Max

Updated October 21, 2026. 38 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
28.2
Overall
24.1
Output $/M
$4.50
4
Qwen3.7 MaxQwen
Coding
45.1
Overall
29.5
Output $/M
$4.425
34
vs boards won of 38 shared

Decision reading

Pick Qwen3.7 Max for coding: it scores 45.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.2 for GPT-5.4 Mini.

Pick GPT-5.4 Mini when a solved task costs $0.70 against $4.69, or when what matters is SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Shared results
38
GPT-5.4 Mini only
50
Qwen3.7 Max only
21
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Mini 28.2 from 1 benchmark, Qwen3.7 Max 45.1 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Math, 12.3 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SimpleQA Verified: GPT-5.4 Mini 29.4% against Qwen3.7 Max 55.8%, 26.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 against Qwen3.7 Max $4.425 per million output tokens, 1.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens, Qwen3.7 Max 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 MiniBarsQwen3.7 MaxTies
Coding48
Intelligence02
Agentic work06
Reasoning06
Math04
Knowledge04
General04
All shared boards434
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index48
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 MaxLeader
LMArena WebDev13971515Qwen3.7 Max
AA Coding Index56.166.0Qwen3.7 Max
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.5%87.1%Qwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.0%68.8%GPT-5.4 Mini
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.0%47.7%GPT-5.4 Mini
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%13.1%Qwen3.7 Max
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%61.0%Qwen3.7 Max
SciCode52.1%49.5%GPT-5.4 Mini
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)52.3%50.8%GPT-5.4 Mini
FrontierCode27.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1188.61189.4Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: React13861514Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena WebDev: HTML14191512Qwen3.7 Max
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.129.5Qwen3.7 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index148.7154.0Qwen3.7 Max
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AA Agentic Index17.922.5Qwen3.7 Max
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1208Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1191Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1153Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1165Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1187Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1161Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1158Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1196Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)45.4%47.8%Qwen3.7 Max
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)8.8%15.8%Qwen3.7 Max
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)12.5%25.5%Qwen3.7 Max
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)45.4%57.0%Qwen3.7 Max
τ²-Bench Telecom83.3%94.7%Qwen3.7 Max
DeepResearch Bench36.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 MaxLeader
GPQA Diamond83.1%90.2%Qwen3.7 Max
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.1%40.5%Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.9%90.9%Qwen3.7 Max
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-218.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SimpleBenchNot measured70.4%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Chess puzzles23.0%26.0%Qwen3.7 Max
Mystery game puzzles11.0%32.0%Qwen3.7 Max
EBR-benchNot measured9.5%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1424Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expert1435Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1420Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1266Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1285Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 MaxLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%95.6%Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 351.2%64.6%Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath, tier 49.8%34.1%Qwen3.7 Max
ProofBench21.0%26.0%Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text: math1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1429Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 MaxLeader
MMLU Pro84.5%89.3%Qwen3.7 Max
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.9%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.9%63.7%Qwen3.7 Max
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.2%75.3%Qwen3.7 Max
MortgageTax (Vals AI)63.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured38.8%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
SimpleQA Verified29.4%55.8%Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text: science1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1414Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1274Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1269Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1265Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1275Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1266Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1275Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1216Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1211Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 MaxLeader
SAGE (Vals AI)50.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured79.4%Only Qwen3.7 Max measured
Vals Multimodal Index54.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
IFBench73.3%80.5%Qwen3.7 Max
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.0%79.0%Qwen3.7 Max
DTBench80.0%92.3%Qwen3.7 Max
LMCA40.8%44.0%Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision1245Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-English1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1446Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: German1408Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1375Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1441Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Polish1415Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1429Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1408Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1393Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1373Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: English1244Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1286Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1253Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1222Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 MaxLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.0030Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.0037Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.051Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.087Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.195Fits in one request
Qwen3.7 Max$0.339Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.7 Max
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.7 Max
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026May 21, 2026
Context window400K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.75$1.475
Output $/Mtok$4.50$4.425
Coding index28.245.1
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved task$0.70$4.69
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Mini better than Qwen3.7 Max for coding?

Pick Qwen3.7 Max for coding: it scores 45.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.2 for GPT-5.4 Mini. Pick GPT-5.4 Mini when a solved task costs $0.70 against $4.69, or when what matters is SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI) or Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Mini or Qwen3.7 Max?

GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.475 and $4.425. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.70 and Qwen3.7 Max $4.69.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Mini or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max, with 1M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.7 Max comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.4 Mini's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.7 Max's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next