Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Sol

Updated October 21, 2026. 66 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
28.2
Overall
24.1
Output $/M
$4.50
25
GPT-6 SolOpenAI
Coding
82.8
Overall
47.6
Output $/M
$10.00
41
vs boards won of 66 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-6 Sol for coding: it scores 82.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.2 for GPT-5.4 Mini.

Pick GPT-5.4 Mini when output tokens cost 2.2x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: software and IT or LMArena Text: hard prompts, where it leads.

Shared results
66
GPT-5.4 Mini only
22
GPT-6 Sol only
34
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Mini 28.2 from 1 benchmark, GPT-6 Sol 82.8 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 32.4 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tier 4: GPT-5.4 Mini 9.8% against GPT-6 Sol 90.0%, 80.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 against GPT-6 Sol $10.00 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens, GPT-6 Sol 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 MiniBarsGPT-6 SolTies
Coding112
Intelligence02
Agentic work04
Reasoning110
Math24
Knowledge41
General178
All shared boards2541
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index112
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 SolLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured93.1%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev13971683GPT-6 Sol
AA Coding Index56.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%44.4%GPT-6 Sol
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.0%87.8%GPT-6 Sol
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%57.2%GPT-6 Sol
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%2.0%GPT-6 Sol
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured82.6%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%83.2%GPT-6 Sol
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured78.0%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
SciCode52.1%57.6%GPT-6 Sol
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierCode27.0%49.3%GPT-6 Sol
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1188.62462.0GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: coding14381448GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: software and IT14361433GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena WebDev: React13861685GPT-6 Sol
LMArena WebDev: HTML14191685GPT-6 Sol
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1660Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 SolLeader
AA Intelligence Index24.147.6GPT-6 Sol
Epoch Capabilities Index148.7163.7GPT-6 Sol
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 SolLeader
AA Agentic Index17.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1232Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1238Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1216Only GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveBench researchNot measured69.3%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveBench browserNot measured92.0%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured66.9%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured30.5%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)45.4%49.0%GPT-6 Sol
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)8.8%15.0%GPT-6 Sol
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)12.5%28.9%GPT-6 Sol
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)45.4%71.5%GPT-6 Sol
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured74.8%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured30.0%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured45.0%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured54.3%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
DeepResearch Bench36.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SpireClimbNot measured7.5%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$14,428Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 SolLeader
GPQA Diamond83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.7%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured30.2%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.1%47.9%GPT-6 Sol
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.9%94.3%GPT-6 Sol
ARC-AGI63.7%95.5%GPT-6 Sol
ARC-AGI-218.9%89.6%GPT-6 Sol
Chess puzzles23.0%56.0%GPT-6 Sol
Mystery game puzzles11.0%56.0%GPT-6 Sol
EBR-benchNot measured53.3%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14241422GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: expert14351437GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14201420GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision: diagrams12661270GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision: homework12851286GPT-6 Sol
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 SolLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%100.0%GPT-6 Sol
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 351.2%89.8%GPT-6 Sol
FrontierMath, tier 49.8%90.0%GPT-6 Sol
ProofBench21.0%83.0%GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: math14181407GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: mathematical work14291424GPT-5.4 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index41
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 SolLeader
MMLU Pro84.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)63.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured47.1%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
SimpleQA Verified29.4%60.7%GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: science14171389GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13951366GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: legal and government14141396GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: business and finance14181380GPT-5.4 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 SolLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1292Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1292Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1313Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1269Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1322Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1301Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1318Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1226Only GPT-6 Sol measured
LiveBench designNot measured82.2%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index178
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 SolLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured81.2%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured56.6%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
SAGE (Vals AI)50.8%44.8%GPT-5.4 Mini
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
Vals Multimodal Index54.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
IFBench73.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.0%83.7%GPT-6 Sol
DTBench80.0%97.3%GPT-6 Sol
LMCA40.8%59.1%GPT-6 Sol
Furniture assemblyNot measured58.3%Only GPT-6 Sol measured
LMArena Text14121398GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: instruction following14051413GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: creative writing13701378GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision12451240GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: English14121396GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: non-English14051388GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: Chinese14461412GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: German14081379GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: Japanese13751377GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: Korean13701336GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: French14411399GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: Spanish14051387GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: Russian14171402GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: Polish14151372GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: multi-turn14291414GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: longer queries14081416GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text: writing and language13931389GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13731373GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Vision: English12441229GPT-5.4 Mini
LMArena Vision: Chinese1286Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text12531258GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12221219GPT-5.4 Mini
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6 SolLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.0030Fits in one request
GPT-6 Sol$0.0070Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.051Fits in one request
GPT-6 Sol$0.130Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.195Fits in one request
GPT-6 Sol$0.500Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6 Sol
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI GPT-6 Sol
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026September 22, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.75$2.00
Output $/Mtok$4.50$10.00
Coding index28.282.8
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved task$0.70Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Mini better than GPT-6 Sol for coding?

Pick GPT-6 Sol for coding: it scores 82.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.2 for GPT-5.4 Mini. Pick GPT-5.4 Mini when output tokens cost 2.2x less, or when what matters is LMArena Text: software and IT or LMArena Text: hard prompts, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Mini or GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Mini or GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6 Sol, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6 Sol comparison based on?

66 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.4 Mini's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-6 Sol's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next