Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6.1 Terra

GPT-6.1 Terra leads GPT-5.4 Mini on coding, 77.4 to 35.8 on the Vibe Coding Index, at about the same output price ($5.00 vs $4.50 per million). Updated October 29, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI
Coding
35.8
Overall
45.7
Output $/M
$4.50
0
GPT-6.1 TerraOpenAI
Coding
77.4
Overall
76.8
Output $/M
$5.00
17
vs boards won of 17 shared

GPT-5.4 Mini or GPT-6.1 Terra: which to pick

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 35.8 for GPT-5.4 Mini, though on 4 benchmarks against 5.

Pick GPT-5.4 Mini for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($4.50 vs $5.00 per million).

Shared results
17
GPT-5.4 Mini only
71
GPT-6.1 Terra only
19
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.4 Mini 35.8 from 5 benchmarks, GPT-6.1 Terra 77.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 44.6 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
FrontierMath, tier 4: GPT-5.4 Mini 9.8% against GPT-6.1 Terra 92.7%, 82.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.4 Mini $4.50 against GPT-6.1 Terra $5.00 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.4 Mini takes 400K tokens, GPT-6.1 Terra 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.4 MiniBarsGPT-6.1 TerraTies
Coding07
Agentic work02
Reasoning03
Math03
Knowledge01
General01
All shared boards017
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured94.3%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena WebDev13971673GPT-6.1 Terra
AA Coding Index56.1Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)81.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)73.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)2.5%49.5%GPT-6.1 Terra
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)48.0%84.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
Code migration (Vals AI)12.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)0.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)54.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SciCode52.1%55.1%GPT-6.1 Terra
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)52.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
FrontierCode27.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
WeirdML60.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ALE-Bench1188.62608.8GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena Text: coding1438Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1436Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena WebDev: React13861657GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena WebDev: HTML14191719GPT-6.1 Terra
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured51.0Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Epoch Capabilities Index148.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
AA Agentic Index17.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveBench researchNot measured73.9%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench browserNot measured93.1%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured48.6%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)8.8%15.2%GPT-6.1 Terra
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)12.5%26.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)45.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured68.3%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
DeepResearch Bench36.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MCP Atlas56.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
GPQA Diamond83.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured88.7%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)79.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)87.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)28.1%46.2%GPT-6.1 Terra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)86.9%94.3%GPT-6.1 Terra
ARC-AGI63.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-218.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Chess puzzles23.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles11.0%74.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
EBR-benchNot measured78.1%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1424Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: expert1435Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1420Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1266Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1285Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Scale run)Not measured35.7%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
AIME95.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME88.9%100.0%GPT-6.1 Terra
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 351.2%90.9%GPT-6.1 Terra
FrontierMath, tier 49.8%92.7%GPT-6.1 Terra
ProofBench21.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math1418Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1428Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
MMLU Pro84.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)51.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)60.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)63.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified29.4%57.3%GPT-6.1 Terra
LMArena Text: science1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1414Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1283Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1277Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1348Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1295Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench designNot measured82.3%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Vals IndexNot measured60.5%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured82.3%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Vals Multimodal Index54.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
IFBench73.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.0%82.7%GPT-6.1 Terra
DTBench80.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMCA40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured79.2%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
LMArena Text1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1370Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision1245Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English1412Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: non-English1405Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1446Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: German1409Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1374Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1368Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French1442Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1404Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian1417Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Polish1416Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1429Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1407Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1393Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1373Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: English1244Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1286Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1253Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1235Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1218Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1222Not measuredOnly GPT-5.4 Mini measured
MultiChallengeNot measured74.2%Only GPT-6.1 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
BenchmarkGPT-5.4 MiniGPT-6.1 TerraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.0030Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Terra$0.0035Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.051Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Terra$0.065Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.4 Mini$0.195Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Terra$0.250Fits in one request

GPT-5.4 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.4 Mini and GPT-6.1 Terra
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.4 MiniOpenAI GPT-6.1 Terra
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 17, 2026October 26, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.75$1.00
Output $/Mtok$4.50$5.00
Coding index35.877.4
Independent measurements behind it54
Cost per solved task$0.70Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.4 Mini better than GPT-6.1 Terra for coding?

Pick GPT-6.1 Terra for coding: it scores 77.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 35.8 for GPT-5.4 Mini, though on 4 benchmarks against 5. Pick GPT-5.4 Mini for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($4.50 vs $5.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.4 Mini or GPT-6.1 Terra?

GPT-5.4 Mini costs $0.75 per million input tokens and $4.50 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Terra costs $1.00 and $5.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.4 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.4 Mini or GPT-6.1 Terra?

GPT-6.1 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6.1 Terra comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 29, 2026. GPT-5.4 Mini's coding index rests on 5 independent benchmarks and GPT-6.1 Terra's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-gpt-6-1-terra" title="GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6.1 Terra, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-4-mini-vs-gpt-6-1-terra">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.4 Mini vs GPT-6.1 Terra</a></p>