Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.3-Codex vs Grok 4.20

Updated October 21, 2026. 27 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.3-CodexOpenAI
Coding
60.0
Overall
32.5
Output $/M
$14.00
14
Grok 4.20xAI
Coding
33.3
Overall
25.7
Output $/M
$2.50
13
vs boards won of 27 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-5.3-Codex for coding: it scores 60.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.3 for Grok 4.20.

Pick Grok 4.20 when output tokens cost 5.6x less, or when the context window is larger, 2M against 400K tokens.

Shared results
27
GPT-5.3-Codex only
7
Grok 4.20 only
27
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.3-Codex 60.0 from 3 benchmarks, Grok 4.20 33.3 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 21.6 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI): GPT-5.3-Codex 61.8% against Grok 4.20 4.1%, 57.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.3-Codex $14.00 against Grok 4.20 $2.50 per million output tokens, 5.6x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.3-Codex takes 400K tokens, Grok 4.20 2M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.3-CodexBarsGrok 4.20Ties
Coding60
Intelligence20
Agentic work34
Reasoning20
Web design08
General11
All shared boards1413
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.20Leader
LMArena WebDev1407Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)87.3%84.3%GPT-5.3-Codex
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)78.0%72.2%GPT-5.3-Codex
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)61.8%4.1%GPT-5.3-Codex
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured0.3%Only Grok 4.20 measured
IOI (Vals AI)53.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured44.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)53.0%37.9%GPT-5.3-Codex
Terminal-Bench78.4%57.3%GPT-5.3-Codex
WeirdML79.3%52.3%GPT-5.3-Codex
ALE-Bench1655.2Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: React1395Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1422Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1443Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.20Leader
AA Intelligence Index32.525.7GPT-5.3-Codex
Epoch Capabilities Index157.1152.1GPT-5.3-Codex
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index34
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.20Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps10321144Grok 4.20
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps9831054Grok 4.20
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps10531090Grok 4.20
Design Arena: agents building Android apps10841052GPT-5.3-Codex
Design Arena: agents building Godot games11241089GPT-5.3-Codex
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1180Only Grok 4.20 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.0%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured13.9%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured11.7%Only Grok 4.20 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom86.0%93.0%Grok 4.20
METR time horizons74.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.3-Codex measured
Vending-Bench 2$5,940$4,663GPT-5.3-Codex
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured88.6%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)91.5%91.1%GPT-5.3-Codex
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.5%34.5%GPT-5.3-Codex
ARC-AGINot measured89.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured65.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.20Leader
AIMENot measured96.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.20Leader
MMLU ProNot measured86.3%Only Grok 4.20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured77.7%Only Grok 4.20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured54.4%Only Grok 4.20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured63.7%Only Grok 4.20 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured45.4%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured94.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured32.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.20Leader
Design Arena: websites11631229Grok 4.20
Design Arena: UI components11371199Grok 4.20
Design Arena: game dev11611192Grok 4.20
Design Arena: data viz11631217Grok 4.20
Design Arena: 3D10081193Grok 4.20
Design Arena: all code categories11451221Grok 4.20
Design Arena: SVG11291164Grok 4.20
Design Arena: ASCII art11511174Grok 4.20
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured63.4%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured39.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
IFBench75.4%81.2%Grok 4.20
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)83.3%69.0%GPT-5.3-Codex
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
LMCANot measured38.7%Only Grok 4.20 measured
CL-benchNot measured22.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured11.9%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-5.3-CodexGrok 4.20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex$0.0088Fits in one request
Grok 4.20$0.0025Fits in one request

Grok 4.20 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex$0.130Fits in one request
Grok 4.20$0.070Fits in one request

Grok 4.20 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.3-Codex$0.490Fits in one request
Grok 4.20$0.275Fits in one request

Grok 4.20 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.3-Codex and Grok 4.20
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.3-CodexSpaceXAI Grok 4.20
MakerOpenAIxAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 24, 2026March 31, 2026
Context window400K2M
Input $/Mtok$1.75$1.25
Output $/Mtok$14.00$2.50
Coding index60.033.3
Independent measurements behind it32
Cost per solved task$0.59$0.72
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.3-Codex better than Grok 4.20 for coding?

Pick GPT-5.3-Codex for coding: it scores 60.0 on the Vibe Coding Index against 33.3 for Grok 4.20. Pick Grok 4.20 when output tokens cost 5.6x less, or when the context window is larger, 2M against 400K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.3-Codex or Grok 4.20?

GPT-5.3-Codex costs $1.75 per million input tokens and $14.00 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 costs $1.25 and $2.50. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-5.3-Codex costs $0.59 and Grok 4.20 $0.72.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.3-Codex or Grok 4.20?

Grok 4.20, with 2M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.3-Codex vs Grok 4.20 comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.3-Codex's coding index rests on 3 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next

Embed this comparison on your site

Free under CC BY 4.0, while the source link stays visible. Preview the frame · Terms and other embeds

<iframe src="https://llmbenchmark.ai/embed/compare/gpt-5-3-codex-vs-grok-4-20" title="GPT-5.3-Codex vs Grok 4.20, LLMBenchmark.ai" width="100%" height="360" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif;margin:6px 0 0">Source: <a href="https://llmbenchmark.ai/compare/gpt-5-3-codex-vs-grok-4-20">LLMBenchmark.ai, GPT-5.3-Codex vs Grok 4.20</a></p>