Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o vs Muse Spark 1.2

Updated October 21, 2026. 11 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
38.8
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
65.1
Overall
39.6
Output $/M
$4.25
11
vs boards won of 11 shared

Decision reading

GPT-4o scores 38.8 and Muse Spark 1.2 65.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 when output tokens cost 2.4x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Shared results
11
GPT-4o only
15
Muse Spark 1.2 only
86
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o 38.8 from 1 benchmark, Muse Spark 1.2 65.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Web design, 55.3 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: websites: GPT-4o 831 against Muse Spark 1.2 1313, 60.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o $10.00 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.4x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4oBarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Reasoning02
Web design06
General03
All shared boards011
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index25 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.2Leader
SWE-bench Verified38.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Lite38.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)18.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Multimodal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)30.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SciCodeNot measured57.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1505Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1505Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured39.6Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1182Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1228Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1179Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1135Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1198Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom25.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GDPval9.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)54.3%90.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.4%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
ARC-AGI4.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1489Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1475Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1487Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1480Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU88.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1500Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1496Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1517Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websites8311313Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: UI components8851300Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: game dev9061302Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: data viz8581334Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: 3D8691301Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: all code categories8611313Muse Spark 1.2
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1285Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
General benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IFBench34.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)49.3%79.0%Muse Spark 1.2
DTBench64.5%94.7%Muse Spark 1.2
LMCA16.6%48.4%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena TextNot measured1482Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1436Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1304Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1483Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1476Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1509Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1462Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1495Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1484Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1483Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1502Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1473Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1453Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1443Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1291Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4oMuse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4oMeta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 13, 2024August 5, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$1.25
Output $/Mtok$10.00$4.25
Coding index38.865.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

GPT-4o scores 38.8 and Muse Spark 1.2 65.1 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick Muse Spark 1.2 when output tokens cost 2.4x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Muse Spark 1.2?

GPT-4o costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.2's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next