Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning leads GPT-4o-mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.9 to 6.7, and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs 4.1x less per output token ($0.147 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-miniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA
Coding
22.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.147
5
vs boards won of 5 shared

GPT-4o-mini or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which to pick

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
5
GPT-4o-mini only
24
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only
15
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 22.6 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 19.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4o-mini 42.6% against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 74.3%, 31.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini $0.60 against Nemotron 3.5 Lightning $0.147 per million output tokens, 4.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini takes 128K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-miniBarsNemotron 3.5 LightningTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning02
Knowledge01
All shared boards05
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Coding Index11.426.8Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)26.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured52.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured3.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured10.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured29.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)23.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
SciCodeNot measured32.1%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
ALE-BenchNot measured769.2Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Intelligence Index6.712.9Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Epoch Capabilities Index126.5Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured3.5Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured18.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured2.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured2.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured17.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
GPQA Diamond44.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)56.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)42.6%74.3%Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)4.2%10.6%Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
AIME11.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)72.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)86.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AA Math Index14.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)14.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
GSM8K91.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
MMLU Pro62.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)45.5%54.2%Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
TaxEval (Vals AI)60.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)54.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)72.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)64.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
MMLU81.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured4.3%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
IFBench31.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured60.3%Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning measured
DTBench54.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
LMCA10.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
PIQA88.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniNemotron 3.5 LightningLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0004Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0001Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.0093Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.0031Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini$0.036Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning$0.012Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-miniNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
MakerOpenAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024August 11, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.0534
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.147
Coding indexNot benchmarked22.6
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.06
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini better than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning for coding?

Only Nemotron 3.5 Lightning has a coding score, 22.6 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

GPT-4o-mini costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Lightning costs $0.0534 and $0.147. Cost per solved task is known for Nemotron 3.5 Lightning only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning comparison based on?

5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o-mini's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Lightning's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next