Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Updated October 21, 2026. 31 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
3.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
65.1
Overall
39.6
Output $/M
$4.25
31
vs boards won of 31 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for coding: it scores 65.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18).

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 7.1x less.

Shared results
31
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
15
Muse Spark 1.2 only
66
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 3.6 from 1 benchmark, Muse Spark 1.2 65.1 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 40.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
SimpleBench: GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 10.7% against Muse Spark 1.2 74.5%, 63.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 7.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)BarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding03
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge05
General016
All shared boards031
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Aider polyglot3.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured72.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SciCodeNot measured57.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdML11.8%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: coding12901505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT12911505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured39.6Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1182Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1228Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1179Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1135Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1198Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured45.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SimpleBench10.7%74.5%Muse Spark 1.2
Chess puzzles3.0%27.0%Muse Spark 1.2
Mystery game puzzles12.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCT34.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12671489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert12341475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12781487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MATH level 552.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math12671484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work12711480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SimpleQA Verified8.3%60.3%Muse Spark 1.2
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science12861500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12821496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government13051517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance12651484Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1300Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1302Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1334Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1301Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1285Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMCANot measured48.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text12861482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following12581462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing12681436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision10661304Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: English13011483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English12661476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese12651509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1216Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Korean11951462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: French12971495Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Spanish12761484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian12751483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Polish1244Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12851502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries12891473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language12821453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12531443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: English10721291Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: Chinese1033Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Meta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024August 5, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$4.25
Coding index3.665.1
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.2 for coding: it scores 65.1 on the Vibe Coding Index against 3.6 for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18). Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) when output tokens cost 7.1x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Muse Spark 1.2?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Muse Spark 1.2's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next