Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Grok 4.20

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs 4.2x less per output token than Grok 4.20 ($0.60 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
Grok 4.20xAI
Coding
33.3
Overall
41.0
Output $/M
$2.50
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Grok 4.20: which to pick

Only Grok 4.20 has a coding score, 33.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for output tokens 4.2x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.50 per million).

Shared results
1
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
45
Grok 4.20 only
54
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) not benchmarked, Grok 4.20 33.3 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 40.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
WeirdML: GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 11.8% against Grok 4.20 52.3%, 40.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against Grok 4.20 $2.50 per million output tokens, 4.2x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) takes 128K tokens, Grok 4.20 2M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)BarsGrok 4.20Ties
Coding01
All shared boards01
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Grok 4.20Leader
Aider polyglot3.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.3%Only Grok 4.20 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured4.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured0.3%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured44.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured37.9%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured57.3%Only Grok 4.20 measured
WeirdML11.8%52.3%Grok 4.20
LMArena Text: coding1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Grok 4.20Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured25.7Only Grok 4.20 measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured152.1Only Grok 4.20 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Grok 4.20Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1144Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1054Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1090Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1045Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1089Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1180Only Grok 4.20 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.0%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured13.9%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured11.7%Only Grok 4.20 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.0%Only Grok 4.20 measured
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$4,663Only Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Grok 4.20Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured88.6%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
ARC-AGINot measured89.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured65.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
SimpleBench10.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzles3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzles12.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCT34.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: expert1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured75.0%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Grok 4.20Leader
AIMENot measured96.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 552.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1271Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index15 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Grok 4.20Leader
MMLU ProNot measured86.3%Only Grok 4.20 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured77.7%Only Grok 4.20 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured54.4%Only Grok 4.20 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured63.7%Only Grok 4.20 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured45.4%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured94.5%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured32.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
SimpleQA Verified8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science1286Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1282Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1305Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Grok 4.20Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1229Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1197Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1193Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1217Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1193Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1221Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1165Only Grok 4.20 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1175Only Grok 4.20 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Grok 4.20Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured38.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured63.4%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured39.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
IFBenchNot measured81.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured69.0%Only Grok 4.20 measured
DTBenchNot measured90.1%Only Grok 4.20 measured
LMCANot measured38.7%Only Grok 4.20 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
CL-benchNot measured22.2%Only Grok 4.20 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured11.9%Only Grok 4.20 measured
LMArena Text1286Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1258Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1268Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision1066Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1266Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: German1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1216Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1195Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: French1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1276Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1275Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1244Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1289Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1282Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1253Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1033Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Grok 4.20Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
Grok 4.20$0.0025Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
Grok 4.20$0.070Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Grok 4.20$0.275Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Grok 4.20
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)SpaceXAI Grok 4.20
MakerOpenAIxAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024March 31, 2026
Context window128K2M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$1.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarked33.3
Independent measurements behind it02
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.72
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than Grok 4.20 for coding?

Only Grok 4.20 has a coding score, 33.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for output tokens 4.2x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Grok 4.20?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 costs $1.25 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Grok 4.20 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Grok 4.20?

Grok 4.20, with 2M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Grok 4.20 comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Grok 4.20's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next