Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs 16.7x less per output token than GPT-6.1 Sol ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI
Coding
82.4
Overall
81.4
Output $/M
$10.00
32
vs boards won of 32 shared

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GPT-6.1 Sol: which to pick

Only GPT-6.1 Sol has a coding score, 82.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for output tokens 16.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million).

Shared results
32
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
14
GPT-6.1 Sol only
71
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) not benchmarked, GPT-6.1 Sol 82.4 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Math, 65.8 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
OTIS Mock AIME: GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 6.9% against GPT-6.1 Sol 100.0%, 93.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against GPT-6.1 Sol $10.00 per million output tokens, 16.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) takes 128K tokens, GPT-6.1 Sol 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)BarsGPT-6.1 SolTies
Coding02
Reasoning06
Math04
Knowledge05
General015
All shared boards032
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-6.1 SolLeader
Aider polyglot3.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LiveBench codingNot measured96.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1753Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured55.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured65.1%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured3.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured96.9%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured43.5%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SciCodeNot measured55.8%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
FrontierCodeNot measured50.2%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
WeirdML11.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
ALE-BenchNot measured2743.8Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text: coding12901478GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: software and IT12911476GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1754Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1800Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1702Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SciCodeNot measured9.2%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured96.1%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-6.1 SolLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured51.8Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured168.4Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-6.1 SolLeader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1307Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1224Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1270Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LiveBench researchNot measured83.5%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LiveBench browserNot measured88.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured73.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured50.8%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured52.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured6.3%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured70.8%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured79.6%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured52.9%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured59.6%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Robo-bench (Vals AI)Not measured28.3%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured60.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SpireClimbNot measured24.7%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-6.1 SolLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured92.6%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured46.4%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured52.9%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%95.4%GPT-6.1 Sol
ARC-AGINot measured98.5%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured94.2%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SimpleBench10.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzles3.0%68.0%GPT-6.1 Sol
Mystery game puzzles12.0%80.0%GPT-6.1 Sol
EBR-benchNot measured54.3%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
VPCT34.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12671463GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: expert12341489GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12781465GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1306Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1356Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-6.1 SolLeader
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%100.0%GPT-6.1 Sol
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%93.7%GPT-6.1 Sol
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured100.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
ProofBenchNot measured99.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
MATH level 552.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math12671489GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: mathematical work12711513GPT-6.1 Sol
MathArenaNot measured84.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-6.1 SolLeader
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured48.8%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SimpleQA Verified8.3%73.9%GPT-6.1 Sol
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science12861444GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12821433GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: legal and government13051471GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: business and finance12651445GPT-6.1 Sol
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured75.3%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
PRBench FinanceNot measured46.2%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
PRBench LegalNot measured47.9%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-6.1 SolLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1321Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1323Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1393Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1286Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1458Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1346Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LiveBench designNot measured82.1%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index015
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-6.1 SolLeader
Vals IndexNot measured63.9%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured82.7%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured46.5%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured86.5%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured84.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
DTBenchNot measured96.5%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMCANot measured62.8%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured80.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Text12861443GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: instruction following12581466GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: creative writing12681425GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision10661288GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: English13011450GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: non-English12661433GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: Chinese12651487GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: German1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1216Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1195Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: French12971460GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: Spanish12761439GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: Russian12751457GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: Polish1244Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn12851442GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: longer queries12891458GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: writing and language12821444GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12531426GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision: English10721274GPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision: Chinese1033Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1289Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1301Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
MultiChallengeNot measured82.0%Only GPT-6.1 Sol measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-6.1 SolLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Sol$0.0070Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-6.1 Sol$0.130Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
GPT-6.1 Sol$0.500Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-6.1 Sol
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI GPT-6.1 Sol
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024September 29, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.60$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked82.4
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than GPT-6.1 Sol for coding?

Only GPT-6.1 Sol has a coding score, 82.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for output tokens 16.7x cheaper ($0.60 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2.00 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs GPT-6.1 Sol comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-6.1 Sol's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next