LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Hy4 preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 1 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)OpenAI
Coding
23.1
Overall
7.7
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Hy4 previewTencent
Coding
61.6
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.501
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

Decision reading

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) scores 23.1 and Hy4 preview 61.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking.

Pick Hy4 preview when output tokens cost 4.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Shared results
1
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) only
57
Hy4 preview only
23
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 23.1 from 1 benchmark, Hy4 preview 61.6 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Knowledge, 3.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LegalBench (Vals AI): GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 80.1% against Hy4 preview 83.8%, 3.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) $10.00 against Hy4 preview $2.501 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-08-06) takes 128K tokens, Hy4 preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-08-06)BarsHy4 previewTies
Knowledge01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlyFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index16 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Hy4 previewLeader
Aider polyglot23.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SWE-bench Lite21.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1631Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured8.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only Hy4 preview measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured59.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)31.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: coding1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1653Only Hy4 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1620Only Hy4 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Hy4 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.7Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Hy4 previewLeader
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured2.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured55.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured45.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured8.8%Only Hy4 preview measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured58.1%Only Hy4 preview measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured1.4%Only Hy4 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom28.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Hy4 previewLeader
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)49.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
SimpleBench17.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Chess puzzles6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1264Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: expert1241Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Hy4 previewLeader
AIME14.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)75.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MGSM (Vals AI)90.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
ProofBenchNot measured75.0%Only Hy4 preview measured
MATH level 553.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: math1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Hy4 previewLeader
MMLU Pro74.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.1%83.8%Hy4 preview
CorpFin (Vals AI)39.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)61.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MedQA (Vals AI)88.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.3%Only Hy4 preview measured
SimpleQA Verified26.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
MMLU84.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: science1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1252Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1275Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1232Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index24 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Hy4 previewLeader
Vals IndexNot measured53.2%Only Hy4 preview measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only Hy4 preview measured
IFBench36.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1274Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision1065Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: English1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1262Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1254Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: German1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1218Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: French1263Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1269Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1279Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1009Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-08-06) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-08-06)Hy4 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.0075Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.0021Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.155Fits in one request
Hy4 preview$0.049Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-08-06)$0.600Exceeds the context window
Hy4 preview$0.192Fits in one request

Hy4 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-08-06) and Hy4 preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-08-06)Tencent Hy4 preview
MakerOpenAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 6, 2024August 28, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.834
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.501
Coding index23.161.6
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-08-06) better than Hy4 preview for coding?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) scores 23.1 and Hy4 preview 61.6 on the Vibe Coding Index, but no coding benchmark measured both, so the gap is directional, not a ranking. Pick Hy4 preview when output tokens cost 4.0x less, or when the context window is larger, 1.05M against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Hy4 preview?

GPT-4o (2024-08-06) costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview costs $0.834 and $2.501. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-08-06) or Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-08-06) vs Hy4 preview comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-08-06)'s coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy4 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next