Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 leads GPT-4o (2024-05-13) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.6 to 7.3, and Muse Spark 1.2 costs 3.5x less per output token ($4.25 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 31 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
0
Muse Spark 1.2Meta
Coding
55.7
Overall
60.4
Output $/M
$4.25
31
vs boards won of 31 shared

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Muse Spark 1.2: which to pick

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-05-13) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
31
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
13
Muse Spark 1.2 only
66
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked, Muse Spark 1.2 55.7 from 5 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 39.1 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 24.2 against Muse Spark 1.2 72.2, 48.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 against Muse Spark 1.2 $4.25 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark 1.2 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-05-13)BarsMuse Spark 1.2Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General016
All shared boards031
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured78.2%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1534Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
AA Coding Index24.272.2Muse Spark 1.2
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured79.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured29.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured21.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured53.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured69.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)33.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
SciCodeNot measured57.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
FrontierSWENot measured12.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: coding12971505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: software and IT12971505Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1526Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1543Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.339.6Muse Spark 1.2
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured155.1Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1221Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1210Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1181Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1222Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1178Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1074Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1170Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured67.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured21.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured60.6%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured32.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured43.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured57.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured45.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
METR time horizons40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROG32.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
GPQA Diamond50.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.6%90.4%Muse Spark 1.2
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)1.8%45.5%Muse Spark 1.2
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)48.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
SimpleBenchNot measured74.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured27.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12811489Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: expert12501475Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12931487Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1317Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
ProofBenchNot measured43.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MATH level 551.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math12841484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: mathematical work12841480Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
MMLU ProNot measured88.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured70.9%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured65.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured49.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MMLU84.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science12951500Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12781496Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: legal and government13141517Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: business and finance12621484Muse Spark 1.2
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1312Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1299Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1300Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1334Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1300Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1312Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1283Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1284Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LiveBench designNot measured67.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index016
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured68.5%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured90.1%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured69.8%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.0%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
DTBenchNot measured94.7%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMCANot measured48.4%Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
LMArena Text13001482Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: instruction following12781462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: creative writing12911436Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision11371304Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: English13121483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: non-English12831476Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Chinese12771509Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: German1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Korean12341462Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: French13041495Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Spanish12921484Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Russian12851483Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: Polish1365Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13021502Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: longer queries12881473Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: writing and language12981453Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12891443Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: English11471291Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision: Chinese1132Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1313Only Muse Spark 1.2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Muse Spark 1.2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.2$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark 1.2$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Muse Spark 1.2
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Meta Muse Spark 1.2
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 13, 2024August 5, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$5.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$15.00$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked55.7
Independent measurements behind it05
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.64
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-05-13) better than Muse Spark 1.2 for coding?

Only Muse Spark 1.2 has a coding score, 55.7 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4o (2024-05-13) has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Muse Spark 1.2?

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for Muse Spark 1.2 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Muse Spark 1.2 comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.2's on 5. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next