Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8 27B leads GPT-4 Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 33.7 to 7.0, and Qwen3.8 27B costs 11.8x less per output token ($2.55 vs $30.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 38 benchmarks have a result for both.

Replace GPT-4 Turbo Replace Qwen3.8 27B
GPT-4 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$30.00
0
Qwen3.8 27BQwen
Coding
74.2
Overall
59.6
Output $/M
$2.55
38
vs boards won of 38 shared

GPT-4 Turbo or Qwen3.8 27B: which to pick

Only Qwen3.8 27B has a coding score, 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Model AGPT-4 TurboOpenAINot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.8 27BQwen74.2/1004 independent benchmarks$1.26 per solved task
Shared results
38
GPT-4 Turbo only
4
Qwen3.8 27B only
47
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4 Turbo not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 27B 74.2 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Coding, 39.2 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Vision: Chinese: GPT-4 Turbo 1045 against Qwen3.8 27B 1326, 46.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4 Turbo $30.00 against Qwen3.8 27B $2.55 per million output tokens, 11.8x apart.
Context window
GPT-4 Turbo takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.8 27B 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4 TurboBarsQwen3.8 27BTies
Coding03
Intelligence02
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge05
General022
All shared boards038
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27BLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured86.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1593Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
AA Coding Index21.568.1Qwen3.8 27B
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured84.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured86.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured14.2%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured39.1%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured58.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured38.1%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
SciCodeNot measured46.6%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: coding12681483Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: software and IT12671478Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1602Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1570Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1577Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.033.7Qwen3.8 27B
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3151.7Qwen3.8 27B
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured45.8Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench researchNot measured59.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench browserNot measured32.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured27.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.5%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.1%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured59.7%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured47.5%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27BLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured88.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured80.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured90.5%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.1%33.9%Qwen3.8 27B
ARC-AGINot measured87.5%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured42.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12511459Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: expert12231479Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12661461Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1285Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1295Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27BLeader
ProofBenchNot measured16.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text: math12721455Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12681458Qwen3.8 27B
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27BLeader
MMLU ProNot measured84.3%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.5%82.4%Qwen3.8 27B
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured70.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured64.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured28.7%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
MMLU81.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: science12561467Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12391437Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: legal and government12651447Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: business and finance12221438Qwen3.8 27B
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27BLeader
LiveBench designNot measured75.9%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index022
General benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27BLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.6%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured52.4%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured83.8%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured82.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
DTBench61.6%88.0%Qwen3.8 27B
LMCA9.8%41.4%Qwen3.8 27B
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured45.0%Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Text12721440Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: instruction following12491436Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: creative writing12681383Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision10901269Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: English12911448Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: non-English12451428Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Chinese12421501Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: German12591443Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Japanese11941387Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Korean11871384Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: French12761465Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Spanish12601449Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Russian12591415Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: Polish13021439Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: multi-turn12671440Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: longer queries12541448Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: writing and language12791405Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12581393Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision: English10971267Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision: Chinese10451326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1281Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1237Only Qwen3.8 27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4 Turbo$0.025Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 27B$0.0017Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4 Turbo$0.590Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 27B$0.029Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4 Turbo$2.30Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.8 27B$0.111Fits in one request

Qwen3.8 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4 Turbo and Qwen3.8 27B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4 TurboQwen3.8 27B
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 9, 2024August 14, 2026
Context window128K1M
Input $/Mtok$10.00$0.425
Output $/Mtok$30.00$2.55
Coding indexNot benchmarked74.2
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computable$1.26
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Qwen3.8 27B for coding?

Only Qwen3.8 27B has a coding score, 74.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Qwen3.8 27B?

GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $30.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 27B costs $0.425 and $2.55. Cost per solved task is known for Qwen3.8 27B only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4 Turbo or Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4 Turbo vs Qwen3.8 27B comparison based on?

38 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 27B's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next