Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4 Turbo vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open costs 7.1x less per output token than GPT-4 Turbo ($4.25 vs $30.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4 TurboOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$30.00
0
Muse Spark OpenMeta
Coding
47.4
Overall
44.9
Output $/M
$4.25
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

GPT-4 Turbo or Muse Spark Open: which to pick

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
2
GPT-4 Turbo only
40
Muse Spark Open only
26
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4 Turbo not benchmarked, Muse Spark Open 47.4 from 4 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 40.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4 Turbo 3.1% against Muse Spark Open 43.9%, 40.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4 Turbo $30.00 against Muse Spark Open $4.25 per million output tokens, 7.1x apart.
Context window
GPT-4 Turbo takes 128K tokens, Muse Spark Open 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4 TurboBarsMuse Spark OpenTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured73.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1528Only Muse Spark Open measured
AA Coding Index21.5Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured6.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured21.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)29.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
SciCodeNot measured58.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1590.1Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena Text: coding1268Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1529Only Muse Spark Open measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1495Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMuse Spark OpenLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.0Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
Epoch Capabilities Index127.3155.1Muse Spark Open
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench researchNot measured80.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench browserNot measured36.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured18.9%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured26.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.5%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured25.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured53.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured33.4%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMuse Spark OpenLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured73.7%Only Muse Spark Open measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.0%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.1%43.9%Muse Spark Open
LMArena Text: hard prompts1251Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1223Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1266Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMuse Spark OpenLeader
LMArena Text: math1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1268Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMuse Spark OpenLeader
LegalBench (Vals AI)80.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
MedQA (Vals AI)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)69.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
MMLU81.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: science1256Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1239Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1222Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMuse Spark OpenLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1310Only Muse Spark Open measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1282Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMuse Spark OpenLeader
Vals IndexNot measured48.6%Only Muse Spark Open measured
LiveBench data analysisNot measured60.2%Only Muse Spark Open measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured78.3%Only Muse Spark Open measured
DTBench61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMCA9.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1249Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1268Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1090Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1245Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1242Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1259Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1194Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1187Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1276Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1260Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1259Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1302Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1254Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1279Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1258Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1097Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1045Not measuredOnly GPT-4 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboMuse Spark OpenLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4 Turbo$0.025Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.0034Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4 Turbo$0.590Fits in one request
Muse Spark Open$0.075Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4 Turbo$2.30Exceeds the context window
Muse Spark Open$0.292Fits in one request

Muse Spark Open costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4 Turbo and Muse Spark Open
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4 TurboMeta Muse Spark Open
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 9, 2024October 15, 2026
Context window128K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$10.00$1.25
Output $/Mtok$30.00$4.25
Coding indexNot benchmarked47.4
Independent measurements behind it04
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Muse Spark Open for coding?

Only Muse Spark Open has a coding score, 47.4 on the Vibe Coding Index; GPT-4 Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Muse Spark Open?

GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $30.00 per million output tokens; Muse Spark Open costs $1.25 and $4.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4 Turbo or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4 Turbo vs Muse Spark Open comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark Open's on 4. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next