LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 Mini vs Muse Wonder

Updated October 21, 2026. 34 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI
Coding
28.5
Overall
10.2
Output $/M
$1.60
0
Muse WonderMeta
Coding
64.5
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$20.00
34
vs boards won of 34 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 64.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.5 for GPT-4.1 Mini, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when output tokens cost 12.5x less.

Shared results
34
GPT-4.1 Mini only
50
Muse Wonder only
26
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 Mini 28.5 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Wonder 64.5 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Web design, 48.8 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GPT-4.1 Mini 837 against Muse Wonder 1425, 73.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 Mini $1.60 against Muse Wonder $20.00 per million output tokens, 12.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 Mini takes 1.05M tokens, Muse Wonder 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1 MiniBarsMuse WonderTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Reasoning04
Math02
Knowledge04
Web design06
General015
All shared boards034
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse WonderLeader
Aider polyglot32.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified23.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1652Only Muse Wonder measured
AA Coding Index20.2Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)58.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured49.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured83.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured62.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured66.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured26.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured80.4%Only Muse Wonder measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)48.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured60.3%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
WeirdML37.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding13671522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: software and IT13601515Muse Wonder
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1641Only Muse Wonder measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1694Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse WonderLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.2Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Epoch Capabilities Index134.9161.8Muse Wonder
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse WonderLeader
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1236Only Muse Wonder measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured56.6%Only Muse Wonder measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured36.3%Only Muse Wonder measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured50.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured23.8%Only Muse Wonder measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured67.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
BioMysteryBench (Vals AI)Not measured67.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured22.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Vals Science IndexNot measured39.1%Only Muse Wonder measured
CUA-bench (Vals AI)Not measured7.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
τ²-Bench Telecom52.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$9,432Only Muse Wonder measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse WonderLeader
GPQA Diamond67.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MysteryMechanism (Vals AI)Not measured27.5%Only Muse Wonder measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)70.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.0%50.1%Muse Wonder
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)65.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI3.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Chess puzzles1.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13491506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: expert13381513Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13621506Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: diagrams1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: homework1214Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse WonderLeader
AIME49.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Math Index46.3Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)46.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME44.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 36.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ProofBenchNot measured84.0%Only Muse Wonder measured
MATH level 587.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13431486Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: mathematical work13471514Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse WonderLeader
MMLU Pro77.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)78.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MedQA (Vals AI)84.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)78.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified12.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: science13281506Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13241512Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: legal and government13431505Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: business and finance13221483Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse WonderLeader
Design Arena: websites9971361Muse Wonder
Design Arena: UI components9611371Muse Wonder
Design Arena: game dev10711380Muse Wonder
Design Arena: data viz10341330Muse Wonder
Design Arena: 3D8371425Muse Wonder
Design Arena: all code categories9941370Muse Wonder
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index015
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse WonderLeader
Vals IndexNot measured64.9%Only Muse Wonder measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured70.2%Only Muse Wonder measured
IFBench38.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)44.0%80.7%Muse Wonder
DTBench68.8%95.2%Muse Wonder
LMCA21.1%56.8%Muse Wonder
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text13411502Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: instruction following13331491Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: creative writing12991491Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision1181Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: English13561507Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: non-English13181492Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Chinese13291537Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: German1350Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Korean1298Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: French13581523Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Spanish1319Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: Russian13241522Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: Polish1326Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13541510Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: longer queries13441493Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: writing and language13191496Muse Wonder
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13001482Muse Wonder
LMArena Vision: English1191Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1186Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1188Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: humor1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1174Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1187Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1182Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse WonderLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.0012Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.014Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.025Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$0.260Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.096Fits in one request
Muse Wonder$1.00Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Wonder
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1 MiniMeta Muse Wonder
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 14, 2025October 12, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$4.00
Output $/Mtok$1.60$20.00
Coding index28.564.5
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$1.818Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 Mini better than Muse Wonder for coding?

Pick Muse Wonder for coding: it scores 64.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.5 for GPT-4.1 Mini, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when output tokens cost 12.5x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Mini or Muse Wonder?

GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Muse Wonder costs $4.00 and $20.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-4.1 Mini only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 Mini or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 Mini vs Muse Wonder comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4.1 Mini's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Wonder's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next