LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4.1 Mini vs Muse Spark 1.1

Updated October 21, 2026. 60 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-4.1 MiniOpenAI
Coding
28.5
Overall
10.2
Output $/M
$1.60
0
Muse Spark 1.1Meta
Coding
48.9
Overall
33.7
Output $/M
$4.25
60
vs boards won of 60 shared

Decision reading

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.5 for GPT-4.1 Mini, though on 1 benchmark against 2.

Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when output tokens cost 2.7x less.

Shared results
60
GPT-4.1 Mini only
24
Muse Spark 1.1 only
36
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4.1 Mini 28.5 from 2 benchmarks, Muse Spark 1.1 48.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Web design, 36.2 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GPT-4.1 Mini 837 against Muse Spark 1.1 1260, 52.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4.1 Mini $1.60 against Muse Spark 1.1 $4.25 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-4.1 Mini takes 1.05M tokens, Muse Spark 1.1 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4.1 MiniBarsMuse Spark 1.1Ties
Coding04
Intelligence02
Reasoning010
Math02
Knowledge010
Web design06
General026
All shared boards060
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index04
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Aider polyglot32.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SWE-bench Verified23.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1542Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
AA Coding Index20.271.3Muse Spark 1.1
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)58.2%85.9%Muse Spark 1.1
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured82.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured72.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured31.1%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured69.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured59.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)48.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured58.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
WeirdML37.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding13671498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: software and IT13601498Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1532Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1540Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index10.233.7Muse Spark 1.1
Epoch Capabilities Index134.9154.1Muse Spark 1.1
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured25.8Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1207Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1199Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1177Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1184Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot gamesNot measured1103Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1183Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1194Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1156Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured974Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured57.2%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured38.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured56.4%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Time Horizon Index (Vals AI)Not measured1.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom52.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
APEX-AgentsNot measured31.8%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$6,520Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.1Leader
GPQA Diamond67.9%91.2%Muse Spark 1.1
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)70.5%86.6%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)66.4%89.8%Muse Spark 1.1
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.0%46.2%Muse Spark 1.1
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)65.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI3.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Chess puzzles1.0%34.0%Muse Spark 1.1
Mystery game puzzles7.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13491485Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: expert13381478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13621480Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: diagrams11821305Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: homework12141287Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.1Leader
AIME49.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MATH 500 (Vals AI)88.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MGSM (Vals AI)87.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AA Math Index46.3Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)46.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME44.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 36.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
ProofBenchNot measured39.0%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MATH level 587.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Text: math13431482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: mathematical work13471487Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index010
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.1Leader
MMLU Pro77.2%88.7%Muse Spark 1.1
LegalBench (Vals AI)78.0%85.0%Muse Spark 1.1
CorpFin (Vals AI)57.9%71.3%Muse Spark 1.1
TaxEval (Vals AI)71.9%79.7%Muse Spark 1.1
MortgageTax (Vals AI)65.5%66.1%Muse Spark 1.1
MedQA (Vals AI)84.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)78.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified12.7%57.8%Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: science13281484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13241479Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: legal and government13431481Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: business and finance13221470Muse Spark 1.1
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Design Arena: websites9971270Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: UI components9611290Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: game dev10711269Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: data viz10341268Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: 3D8371260Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: all code categories9941276Muse Spark 1.1
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1234Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1270Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index026
General benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured61.3%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured45.6%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured88.9%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured66.7%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
IFBench38.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)44.0%77.7%Muse Spark 1.1
DTBench68.8%94.4%Muse Spark 1.1
LMCA21.1%49.9%Muse Spark 1.1
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured52.5%Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
LMArena Text13411478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: instruction following13331457Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: creative writing12991435Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision11811293Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: English13561478Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: non-English13181471Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Chinese13291515Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: German13501469Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Japanese12901450Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Korean12981459Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: French13581492Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Spanish13191464Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Russian13241482Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: Polish13261499Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: multi-turn13541484Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: longer queries13441462Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: writing and language13191448Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13001438Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: English11911292Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: Chinese11861348Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: reading text11881301Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: humor11821288Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision: captioning1174Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1187Not measuredOnly GPT-4.1 Mini measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing11821253Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena DocumentNot measured1465Only Muse Spark 1.1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniMuse Spark 1.1Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.0012Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.0034Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.025Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.075Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4.1 Mini$0.096Fits in one request
Muse Spark 1.1$0.292Fits in one request

GPT-4.1 Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4.1 Mini and Muse Spark 1.1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4.1 MiniMeta Muse Spark 1.1
MakerOpenAIMeta
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 14, 2025July 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.40$1.25
Output $/Mtok$1.60$4.25
Coding index28.548.9
Independent measurements behind it21
Cost per solved task$1.818$0.43
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4.1 Mini better than Muse Spark 1.1 for coding?

Pick Muse Spark 1.1 for coding: it scores 48.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.5 for GPT-4.1 Mini, though on 1 benchmark against 2. Pick GPT-4.1 Mini when output tokens cost 2.7x less.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Mini or Muse Spark 1.1?

GPT-4.1 Mini costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 and $4.25. Per solved SWE-bench Verified task, GPT-4.1 Mini costs $1.818 and Muse Spark 1.1 $0.43.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4.1 Mini or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1, with 1.05M tokens against 1.05M.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4.1 Mini vs Muse Spark 1.1 comparison based on?

60 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4.1 Mini's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Muse Spark 1.1's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next