LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs Kimi K2.5

Updated October 21, 2026. 61 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Replace GLM 5V Turbo Replace Kimi K2.5
GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
28.8
Overall
23.5
Output $/M
$4.00
13
Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
Coding
58.5
Overall
23.5
Output $/M
$2.50
47
vs boards won of 61 shared, 1 tied

Decision reading

Pick Kimi K2.5 for coding: it scores 58.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.8 for GLM 5V Turbo.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo when what matters is Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps or Design Arena: agents building Android apps, where it leads.

Model AGLM 5V TurboZ.ai28.8/1001 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BKimi K2.5Moonshot AI58.5/1002 independent benchmarks$0.24 per solved task
Shared results
61
GLM 5V Turbo only
4
Kimi K2.5 only
37
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo 28.8 from 1 benchmark, Kimi K2.5 58.5 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 10.1 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: agents building Godot games: GLM 5V Turbo 957 against Kimi K2.5 1219, 32.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against Kimi K2.5 $2.50 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, Kimi K2.5 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsKimi K2.5Ties
Coding07
Intelligence001 tie
Agentic work33
Reasoning16
Math02
Knowledge13
Web design35
General521
All shared boards13471 tie
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.5Leader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured70.8%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE-bench MultilingualNot measured67.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena WebDev14021437Kimi K2.5
AA Coding IndexNot measured46.8Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.9%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured70.0%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured17.5%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured7.0%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured42.0%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%34.8%Kimi K2.5
Terminal-BenchNot measured43.2%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
WeirdMLNot measured45.6%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured821.6Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: coding14661483Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: software and IT14601471Kimi K2.5
LMArena WebDev: React13861429Kimi K2.5
LMArena WebDev: HTML13561426Kimi K2.5
LMArena WebDev: from an image14251439Kimi K2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.523.5Tie
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured148.1Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index33
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.5Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps11241136Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps11491114GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps11341147Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: agents building Android apps12671124GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: agents building Godot games9571219Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured35.8%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured15.9%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured28.5%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%95.9%GLM 5V Turbo
OSWorldNot measured63.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$1,198Only Kimi K2.5 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index16
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.5Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured84.1%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured84.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%87.9%Kimi K2.5
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%30.7%Kimi K2.5
ARC-AGINot measured65.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured11.8%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleBenchNot measured46.8%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431453Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: expert14531466Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561460Kimi K2.5
LMArena Vision: diagrams12861282GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: homework12731297Kimi K2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.5Leader
AIMENot measured95.6%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: math14421470Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471473Kimi K2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.5Leader
MMLU ProNot measured85.9%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
CaseLaw (Vals AI)Not measured58.7%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured74.2%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured66.5%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
MedQA (Vals AI)Not measured94.4%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured39.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured34.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: science14481459Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331448Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: legal and government14361441Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: business and finance14351427GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index35
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.5Leader
Design Arena: websites12301249Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: UI components12131236Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: game dev12191207GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12021219Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: 3D12091205GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12281236Kimi K2.5
Design Arena: SVG11511149GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII art11181165Kimi K2.5
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index521
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.5Leader
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured49.9%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured76.4%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
IFBench61.1%70.2%Kimi K2.5
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%78.0%Kimi K2.5
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured86.1%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
CL-benchNot measured19.3%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
CL-bench LifeNot measured13.2%Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text14371445Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: instruction following14231431Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: creative writing14171422Kimi K2.5
LMArena Vision12641269Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: English14541453GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201433Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: Chinese14911494Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: German14221441Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1423Only Kimi K2.5 measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971412Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: French14431454Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: Spanish14521450GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321435Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: Polish14321445Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311444Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: longer queries14381445Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: writing and language14201425Kimi K2.5
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071417Kimi K2.5
LMArena Vision: English12741274GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: Chinese13291328GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: reading text12701276Kimi K2.5
LMArena Vision: humor12681284Kimi K2.5
LMArena Vision: captioning12641257GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12411285Kimi K2.5
LMArena Vision: creative writing12521269Kimi K2.5
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboKimi K2.5Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Kimi K2.5$0.0018Fits in one request

Kimi K2.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Kimi K2.5$0.033Fits in one request

Kimi K2.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Kimi K2.5$0.125Fits in one request

Kimi K2.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and Kimi K2.5
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboMoonshotAI Kimi K2.5
MakerZ.aiMoonshot AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026January 27, 2026
Context window203K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.50
Output $/Mtok$4.00$2.50
Coding index28.858.5
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.24
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than Kimi K2.5 for coding?

Pick Kimi K2.5 for coding: it scores 58.5 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.8 for GLM 5V Turbo. Pick GLM 5V Turbo when what matters is Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps or Design Arena: agents building Android apps, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Kimi K2.5?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.5 costs $0.50 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for Kimi K2.5 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5, with 262K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs Kimi K2.5 comparison based on?

61 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Kimi K2.5's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next