Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Terra

GPT-5.6 Terra leads GLM 5V Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 42.1 to 23.5, and GLM 5V Turbo costs 3.0x less per output token ($4.00 vs $12.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 62 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
16
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI
Coding
63.9
Overall
68.1
Output $/M
$12.00
46
vs boards won of 62 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.6 Terra: which to pick

Only GPT-5.6 Terra has a coding score, 63.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5V Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $12.00 per million) and work measured by Design Arena: agents building web apps or Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps, where it leads.

Shared results
62
GLM 5V Turbo only
3
GPT-5.6 Terra only
67
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, GPT-5.6 Terra 63.9 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Intelligence, 18.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run): GLM 5V Turbo 32.6% against GPT-5.6 Terra 62.9%, 30.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against GPT-5.6 Terra $12.00 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-5.6 Terra 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsGPT-5.6 TerraTies
Coding07
Intelligence01
Agentic work80
Reasoning07
Math02
Knowledge13
Web design17
General619
All shared boards1646
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured86.2%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LMArena WebDev14021522GPT-5.6 Terra
AA Coding IndexNot measured76.7Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.9%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured95.4%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured22.7%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured74.6%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
ProgramBench (Vals AI)Not measured0.5%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
IOI (Vals AI)Not measured87.6%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured77.5%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured14.8%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured58.9%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured72.1%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SciCodeNot measured55.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%62.9%GPT-5.6 Terra
FrontierCodeNot measured41.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
WeirdMLNot measured78.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1951.4Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LMArena Text: coding14661485GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: software and IT14601482GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena WebDev: React13861513GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena WebDev: HTML13561526GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena WebDev: from an image14251541GPT-5.6 Terra
SciCodeNot measured10.8%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SWE-Bench Pro V2Not measured92.4%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.542.1GPT-5.6 Terra
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured160.1Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured43.2Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps11241120GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps11491061GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps11341110GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: agents building Android apps12671060GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games11021083GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: HTML slides10601047GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides11261104GLM 5V Turbo
LiveBench researchNot measured60.4%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LiveBench browserNot measured84.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured48.4%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SREBench (Vals AI)Not measured9.5%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured54.4%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured30.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured41.4%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured66.2%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Terminal-Bench-Science (Vals AI)Not measured10.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%86.3%GLM 5V Turbo
APEX-AgentsNot measured58.2%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
BALROGNot measured53.2%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$7,343Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
GPQA DiamondNot measured90.9%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured90.6%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured86.5%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%92.5%GPT-5.6 Terra
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%42.9%GPT-5.6 Terra
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured93.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
ARC-AGINot measured96.5%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured83.9%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SimpleBenchNot measured48.9%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured47.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured35.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431469GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: expert14531496GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561465GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Vision: diagrams12861295GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Vision: homework12731312GPT-5.6 Terra
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured51.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured99.7%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured86.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
FrontierMath, tier 4Not measured70.7%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
ProofBenchNot measured74.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LMArena Text: math14421465GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471478GPT-5.6 Terra
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
MMLU ProNot measured86.7%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.1%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured65.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured76.2%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured67.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured43.4%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured43.2%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LMArena Text: science14481452GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331430GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361461GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: business and finance14351448GPT-5.6 Terra
FACTS Benchmark SuiteNot measured52.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
Design Arena: websites12301268GPT-5.6 Terra
Design Arena: UI components12101256GPT-5.6 Terra
Design Arena: game dev12181229GPT-5.6 Terra
Design Arena: data viz12021240GPT-5.6 Terra
Design Arena: 3D12081134GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12271240GPT-5.6 Terra
Design Arena: SVG11501219GPT-5.6 Terra
Design Arena: ASCII art11161178GPT-5.6 Terra
LiveBench designNot measured76.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index619
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured79.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured62.4%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured47.0%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured82.9%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured65.1%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
IFBench61.1%71.2%GPT-5.6 Terra
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%83.0%GPT-5.6 Terra
DTBenchNot measured93.3%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LMCANot measured54.9%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured83.8%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Furniture assemblyNot measured54.2%Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LMArena Text14371448GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: instruction following14231456GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: creative writing14171413GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision12641271GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: English14541449GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201441GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: Chinese14911514GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: German14221460GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1454Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971427GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: French14431466GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: Spanish14521451GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321452GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: Polish14321446GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311453GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: longer queries14381454GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: writing and language14201431GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071418GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Vision: English12741272GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: Chinese13291337GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Vision: reading text12701278GPT-5.6 Terra
LMArena Vision: humor12681236GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing12521248GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Document14161472GPT-5.6 Terra
EQ-Bench 4Not measured1234Only GPT-5.6 Terra measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.6 TerraLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Terra$0.0080Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
GPT-5.6 Terra$0.136Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.6 Terra$0.520Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.6 Terra
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI GPT-5.6 Terra
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026July 9, 2026
Context window203K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.20$2.00
Output $/Mtok$4.00$12.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked63.9
Independent measurements behind it16
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.42
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than GPT-5.6 Terra for coding?

Only GPT-5.6 Terra has a coding score, 63.9 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5V Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($4.00 vs $12.00 per million) and work measured by Design Arena: agents building web apps or Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Terra costs $2.00 and $12.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.6 Terra only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.6 Terra?

GPT-5.6 Terra, with 1.05M tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-5.6 Terra comparison based on?

62 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.6 Terra's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next