Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3

MiniMax M3 leads GLM 4.7 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 29.2 to 14.9, and GLM 4.7 Flash costs 3.0x less per output token ($0.40 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 43 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 4.7 FlashZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
42.1
Output $/M
$0.40
1
MiniMax M3MiniMax
Coding
39.2
Overall
51.7
Output $/M
$1.20
42
vs boards won of 43 shared

GLM 4.7 Flash or MiniMax M3: which to pick

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
43
GLM 4.7 Flash only
0
MiniMax M3 only
73
Like-for-like categories
8 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 4.7 Flash not benchmarked, MiniMax M3 39.2 from 6 benchmarks.
Widest category
Reasoning, 23.9 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GLM 4.7 Flash 41.7% against MiniMax M3 83.0%, 41.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 4.7 Flash $0.40 against MiniMax M3 $1.20 per million output tokens, 3.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 4.7 Flash takes 200K tokens, MiniMax M3 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 4.7 FlashBarsMiniMax M3Ties
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work10
Reasoning06
Math03
Knowledge04
Web design07
General018
All shared boards142
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench codingNot measured70.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1482Only MiniMax M3 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.6Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured82.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Verified (Vals AI)Not measured75.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 4 (Vals AI)Not measured1.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured47.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Code migration (Vals AI)Not measured19.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals AI)Not measured53.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SWE-bench Multimodal (Vals AI)Not measured33.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vibe Code Bench 1-100 (Vals AI)Not measured9.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SkillsBench (Vals AI)Not measured51.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CyberBench (Vals AI)Not measured65.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SciCodeNot measured47.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)22.0%42.4%MiniMax M3
FrontierCodeNot measured14.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured640.0Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: coding13821470MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: software and IT13891466MiniMax M3
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1478Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1455Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena WebDev: from an imageNot measured1470Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
AA Intelligence Index14.929.2MiniMax M3
Epoch Capabilities IndexNot measured146.9Only MiniMax M3 measured
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured29.5Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1200Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack appsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile appsNot measured1169Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building Android appsNot measured1159Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: agents building gamesNot measured1158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: HTML slidesNot measured1130Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slidesNot measured1181Only MiniMax M3 measured
Design Arena: spreadsheetsNot measured1028Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench researchNot measured68.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench browserNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured12.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Finance Agent (Vals AI)Not measured48.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Tax Agent Bench (Vals AI)Not measured20.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Legal Research Bench (Vals AI)Not measured29.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Excel Modeling Benchmark (Vals AI)Not measured47.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.8%88.9%GLM 4.7 Flash
APEX-AgentsNot measured37.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
OSWorld 2.0Not measured4.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured$2,158Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index06
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured92.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench reasoningNot measured74.5%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MMMU Pro (Vals AI)Not measured81.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)58.1%92.9%MiniMax M3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)7.6%39.0%MiniMax M3
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)60.5%90.9%MiniMax M3
SimpleBenchNot measured45.8%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured13.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured8.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13561447MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: expert13571461MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13691455MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1266Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1268Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Math benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
OTIS Mock AIME58.3%71.1%MiniMax M3
ProofBenchNot measured18.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: math13551429MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: mathematical work13691448MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
MMLU ProNot measured84.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LegalBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
CorpFin (Vals AI)Not measured68.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
TaxEval (Vals AI)Not measured72.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MortgageTax (Vals AI)Not measured68.4%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedCode (Vals AI)Not measured46.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: science13581452MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13431441MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: legal and government13571437MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: business and finance13431434MiniMax M3
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index07
Web design benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
Design Arena: websites11941257MiniMax M3
Design Arena: UI components12051242MiniMax M3
Design Arena: game dev11341210MiniMax M3
Design Arena: data viz11231236MiniMax M3
Design Arena: 3D11201208MiniMax M3
Design Arena: all code categories11771247MiniMax M3
Design Arena: SVG10371161MiniMax M3
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1161Only MiniMax M3 measured
LiveBench designNot measured66.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured76.2%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Public Benefits Bench (Vals AI)Not measured64.1%Only MiniMax M3 measured
SAGE (Vals AI)Not measured50.6%Only MiniMax M3 measured
MedScribe (Vals AI)Not measured87.3%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Vals Multimodal IndexNot measured60.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
IFBench60.8%82.9%MiniMax M3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)41.7%83.0%MiniMax M3
DTBenchNot measured78.9%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMCANot measured33.7%Only MiniMax M3 measured
Surface Evolver BenchNot measured55.0%Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text13511433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: instruction following13271433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: creative writing12961404MiniMax M3
LMArena VisionNot measured1251Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: English13731443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: non-English13301420MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Chinese14031466MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: German13361428MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1380Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Text: Korean12831373MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: French13321444MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Spanish13501433MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Russian13331426MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: Polish12911423MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: multi-turn13421443MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: longer queries13451446MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: writing and language13201419MiniMax M3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13041403MiniMax M3
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1263Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1311Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1259Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1235Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1197Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1234Only MiniMax M3 measured
LMArena DocumentNot measured1435Only MiniMax M3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
BenchmarkGLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.0009Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.0045Fits in one request
MiniMax M3$0.019Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash$0.017Exceeds the context window
MiniMax M3$0.072Fits in one request

GLM 4.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 4.7 Flash and MiniMax M3
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 4.7 FlashMiniMax M3
MakerZ.aiMiniMax
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 19, 2026May 31, 2026
Context window200K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.0653$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.40$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarked39.2
Independent measurements behind it06
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.56
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 4.7 Flash better than MiniMax M3 for coding?

Only MiniMax M3 has a coding score, 39.2 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 4.7 Flash has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 4.7 Flash for output tokens 3.0x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 4.7 Flash or MiniMax M3?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.0653 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; MiniMax M3 costs $0.30 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M3 only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 4.7 Flash or MiniMax M3?

MiniMax M3, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3 comparison based on?

43 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 4.7 Flash's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and MiniMax M3's on 6. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next